SHAN Ruifeng, SONG Junyao, DENG Ruonan, et al. Physical and Chemical Properties of Biochar Produced from Different Materials and Effect on Soil Water Holding Capacity[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 63-68.
DOI:
SHAN Ruifeng, SONG Junyao, DENG Ruonan, et al. Physical and Chemical Properties of Biochar Produced from Different Materials and Effect on Soil Water Holding Capacity[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 63-68. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.05.011.
Physical and Chemical Properties of Biochar Produced from Different Materials and Effect on Soil Water Holding Capacity
[Objective] In order to select the appropriate biochar for soil improvement and remediation
the physical and chemical properties of biochar produced from chicken manure
the enteromorpha and straw were compared
and the effect of biochar on capacity of soil water holding was also compared.[Methods] The biochars were produced at 350
500 and 650℃ under anoxic condition. To investigate the impact on soil and properties of biochar produced from three types of biowaste
the elements analysis and pot experiments were performed.[Results] The element contents in three types of material were obviously different. The contents of carbon
hydrogen and ash in straw were higher than those of others. However
it was found that nitrogen content was higher in chicken manure
and carbon content was lower in enteromorpha but oxygen content was higher. Carbon content and nitrogen content of biochar produced from chicken manure were higher than those of the other two feedstocks
and carbon content of enteromorpha was lower. The H/C mole ratio of biochar was obviously lower than that of feedstock
and it decreased with the increase of pyrolysis temperature. However
the C/N mole ratio increased slowly with the increase of pyrolysis temperature. Moreover
it was found that the pH value of biochar produced from different feedstocks increases with pyrolysis temperature. The pH values increased from 6.82~8.35 to 9.33~10.29. Furthermore
the pH values increased as ash content increased. The pH values of biochar increased variously with the increase of ash content
for the three types of biochar
the increase rate ranked:straw > enteromorpha > chicken manure. It was also found that the water holding capacity of biochar produced from three types of feedstocks gradually improved with the increase of pyrolysis temperature.[Conclusion] Biochar produced from chicken manure behaved better than others did in nutrients providing and water holding capacity.
关键词
Keywords
references
Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for Environmental Management:Science, Technology and Implementation[M]. London and Newyork:Routledge, 2015.
Tripathi M, Sahu J N, Ganesan P. Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis:A review[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016,55:467-481.
Chen Yan, Shinogi Y, Taira M. Influence of biochar use on sugarcane growth, soil parameters, and groundwater quality[J]. Soil Research, 2010, 48(7):526-530.
Piccolo A, Pietramellara G, Mbagwu J S C. Effects of coal derived humic substances on water retention and structural stability of Mediterranean soils[J]. Soil Use and Management, 1996,12(4):209-213.
Xu Yiliang, Chen Baoliang. Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the pyrolysis conversion of biomass and manure to biochars using thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,146(10):485-493.
Glaser B, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G, et a1. The ‘Terra Preta’ phenomenon:A model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tmpics[J]. The Science of Nature, 2001,88(1):37-41.