Methods of Determining Rainfall Thresholds of Landslides and Debris Flows in Typical Region in Sichuan Province

LIU Haizhi; MA Zhenfeng; FAN Guangzhou

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Methods of Determining Rainfall Thresholds of Landslides and Debris Flows in Typical Region in Sichuan Province

- Methods of Determining Rainfall Thresholds of Landslides and Debris Flows in Typical Region in Sichuan Province
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 37, Issue 4, Pages: 126-131(2017)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 国家气象中心,北京,100081
  2. 四川省气候中心,四川,成都,610072
  3. 成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川,成都,610225
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.021
  CLC：
- Published：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LIU Haizhi, MA Zhenfeng, FAN Guangzhou. Methods of Determining Rainfall Thresholds of Landslides and Debris Flows in Typical Region in Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 126-131.
DOI：

LIU Haizhi, MA Zhenfeng, FAN Guangzhou. Methods of Determining Rainfall Thresholds of Landslides and Debris Flows in Typical Region in Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(4): 126-131. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.04.021.

摘要

[目的]确定四川省滑坡泥石流典型区域各个子区最关键的降雨因子，建立典型区域各子区临界阈值模型，为该区对滑坡、泥石流灾害进行有效预报提供科学依据。[方法]利用1999-2014年四川滑坡泥石流灾情资料，确定出滑坡、泥石流的典型区域，根据典型区域各个子区的气候和下垫面条件，比较不同降雨因子组合的阈值模型，得到各子区最关键的降雨因子，建立典型区域各子区临界阈值模型。[结果]平均降雨强度和峰值降雨强度是典型区域滑坡、泥石流阈值模型中的重要指标；诱发雨量多作为滑坡典型区域致灾临界阈值模型雨量指标，激发雨量只作为泥石流典型区域致灾临界阈值模型雨量指标；有效雨量可以在滑坡、泥石流典型区域值模型中应用。典型区域多采用多因子预报模型，只有汶川震区采用单因子预报模型，其临界阈值在震后呈现上升趋势。[结论]不同降雨参数对诱发滑坡泥石流灾害的作用不同，典型区域中各子区建立的预报模型及得出的临界阈值也不同。多因子预报模型考虑了多种降雨参数，比单因子模型更客观。

Abstract

[Objective] We chose the most significant rainfall indicators of landslides and debris flows in typical regions and built a critical threshold model for each sub-region in typical regions to provide a scientific basis for effective prediction of landslide and debris flows.[Methods] This study collected Sichuan's geological disaster cases occurred in 1999-2014

to define the typical regions of landslides and debris flows in Sichuan Province. We compared the threshold models that are made up of different rainfall indicators in each typical region to construct our rainfall threshold models.[Results] Average rainfall intensity and maximum rainfall intensity are used frequently as significant parameters in threshold models of landslides and debris flows in typical regions. Indirect rainfall is a precipitation indicator of landslides in typical region generally

direct rainfall is a precipitation indicator of debris flows just in typical region generally. Effective rainfall was adopted to the precipitation indicator both of landslides and debris flow threshold models in typical regions. Model with double factors were applied to most of typical regions of landslides and debris flows. Model with one factor was just applied to Wenchuan earthquake-stricken area

the critical threshold gradually raised from Wenchuan earthquake.[Conclusion] Different rainfall factor has different effect on disasters

each typical region has its own optimum rainfall threshold model. Model with double factors is more objective than those with just one factor

as they contain more rainfall factors.

关键词

Keywords

references

颜梅春,王元超.区域生态环境质量评价研究进展与展望[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(10):1781-1788.

Berger A R, Hodge R A. Natural change in the environment:A challenge to the pressure-state-response concept[J]. Social Indicators Research, 1998, 44(2):255-265.

Esty D C, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, et al. Environmental Sustainability Index:Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship[M]. New Haven:Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, 2005:47-60.

Hope C, Parker J. Environmental indices for France, Italy and the UK[J]. European Environment, 1995,5(1):13-19.

Kang S M. A sensitivity analysis of the Korean composite environmental index[J].Ecological Economics, 2002,43(2):159-174.

Esty D C, Levy M A, Srebotnjak T, et al. Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index[M]. New Haven:Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, 2006.

Jong-Tae L. A study of review and development environmental health indicators[C]. Korea:National Institute of Environmental Research; Inchon, 2010.

Heo S, Lee J T. Study of environmental health problems in Korea using integrated environmental health indicators[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013, 10(8):3140-3156.

傅伯杰.中国各省区生态环境质量评价与排序[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1992,2(2):48-54.

叶亚平,刘鲁君.中国省域生态环境质量评价指标体系研究[J].环境科学研究,2000,13(3):33-36.

欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.

万本太.中国生态环境质量评价研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2004:5-12.

蔡海生,刘木生,陈美球,等.基于GIS的江西省生态环境脆弱性动态评价[J].水土保持通报,2009(5):190-196.

万本太,王文杰,崔书红,等.城市生态环境质量评价方法[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):1068-1073.

宋静,王会肖,王飞.生态环境质量评价研究进展及方法评述[J].环境科学与技术,2013,36(12):448-454.

丁彩霞,延军平.基于PSR模型的宁夏地区生态环境变化特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):191-196.

王瑞燕,赵庚星,周伟,等.县域生态环境脆弱性评价及其动态分析:以黄河三角洲垦利县为例[J].生态学报,2009,29(7):3790-3799.

Wang Xiaodan, Cao Yingzi, Zhong Xianghao, et al. A new method of regional eco-environmental quality assessment and its application[J]. Journal of environmental quality, 2012, 41(5):1393-1401.

Cui Erqian, Ren Lijun, Sun Haoyu. Evaluation of variations and affecting factors of eco-environmental quality during urbanization[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(5):3958-3968.

孙东琪,张京祥,朱传耿,等.中国生态环境质量变化态势及其空间分异分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(12):1599-1610.

姚尧,王世新,周艺,等.生态环境状况指数模型在全国生态环境质量评价中的应用[J].遥感信息,2012,27(3):93-98.

王宏伟,张小雷,乔木,等.基于GIS的伊犁河流域生态环境质量评价与动态分析[J].干旱区地理,2008,31(2):215-221.

李玲,侯淑涛,赵悦,等.基于PSR模型的河南省土地生态安全评价及预测[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):188-192.

卢艳,于鲁冀,王燕鹏,等.河南省水资源生态足迹和生态承载力分析[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(1):182-186.

蔺芳,张家洋,王书丽,等.河南农村生态环境保护与建设研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(4):406-409.

李钢,王萌,吴烨,等.矿区生态环境评价体系建立与评价:以河南部分矿区为例[J].环境工程,2014(10):125-128.

傅伯杰,刘国华,欧阳志云,等.中国生态区划研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:135-139.

凡宸,夏北成,秦建桥.基于RS和GIS的县域生态环境质量综合评价模型:以惠东县为例[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(3):719-725.

雷莹,江东,杨小唤,等.水资源空间分布模型及GIS分析应用[J].地球信息科学,2007,9(5):64-69.

Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. RUSLE:Revised universal soil loss equation[J]. Journal of soil and Water Conservation, 1991, 46(1):30-33.

李汝资,宋玉祥,李雨停,等.近10年来东北地区生态环境演变及其特征研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(8):935-941.

Views

1709

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Characteristics and Trend of Earthquake-induced Debris Flow Initiation in Jianping Gully

Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility in Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River—Taking Jiangxi Province as a Case Study

Achievement of Mass Monitoring and Preventing on Landslide and Debris Flow in Experimental Counties of South Gansu and Shaanxi Provinces

Influence of different restoration measures on vegetation characteristics and diversity of degraded grasslands in Ili， Xinjiang

Changes and its driving factors of ecological environment quality in Yellow River Source Park from 2000 to 2024

Related Author

YANG Cheng-lin

CHEN Ning-sheng

DENG Ming-feng

DENG Hu

SHE Tao

Tang Xinggang

Wang Huiyong

Huang Dou

Related Institution

Key Lab of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes,Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

College of Earth Science,Chengdu University of Technology

The Institute of Exploration Technology, CAGS

Co-innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration, Nanjing Forestry University

⁰