LI Guozhu, DAI Ailin, SUN Jinxin. Characteristics of Indirect Carbon Emissions and Influence Factors of Residents' Living Expenditure in Jilin Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 146-151.
DOI:
LI Guozhu, DAI Ailin, SUN Jinxin. Characteristics of Indirect Carbon Emissions and Influence Factors of Residents' Living Expenditure in Jilin Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 146-151. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.03.025.
Characteristics of Indirect Carbon Emissions and Influence Factors of Residents' Living Expenditure in Jilin Province
[Objective] The energy consumption and carbon emissions in Jilin Province from residents' expenditure were estimated and their influence factors were analyzed
to provide government decision for guiding local resident to take low carbon consumption and for improving the regional environment.[Methods] Taking Jilin Province as an example
we calculated the energy consumption and carbon emissions generated by various types of consumer activities in 2004-2003. Based on the STIRPAT model
a multivariate linear model fitted by a ridge regression to examine the relationship between carbon emissions and a list of human activity indices was built.[Results] (1) The consumptions of living
education and entertainment
and food were the main aspects of indirect energy consumption and the carbon emission. (2) It was found that every 1% increases of carbon emission intensity
per capita consumption
population and urbanization rate
would result to 0.831%
0.309%
0.184% and 0.055% increases of carbon emission caused by residents' living consumption in Jilin Province. The intensity of carbon emissions had the greatest impact on the carbon consumption of indirect energy consumption in Jilin Province.[Conclusion] The primary measures for reduction of carbon emissions are enhancing energy utilization efficiency and developing new energy.
关键词
Keywords
references
Kerkhof A C, Nonhebel S, Moll H C, et al. Relating the environmental impact of consumption to household expenditures:An input-output analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(4):1160-1170.
Duarte R, Mainar A, Sánchez-Chóliz J. The impact of household consumption emissions in Spain[J]. Energy Economics, 2010,32(1):176-185.
Hiller C. Factors influencing residents' enemy use:A study of enemy-related behavior in 57 Swedish homes[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015,87:243-252.
Jones C M, Kammen D M. Spatial distribution of U. S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization under-mines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(2):895-902.
Wei Yiming, Liu Lancui, Fan Ying, et al. The impact of lifestyle on energy use and emission:An empirical analysis of China's residents[J]. Energy Policy, 2007,35:247-257.
Chertow M R. The IPAT equation and its variant:Changing views of technology and environmental impact[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2000,4(4):13-30.
Richard Y, Eugene A R, Thomas D. STIRPAT, IPAT and Impact:Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003,46(3):351-365.