Benefit Evaluation on Land Reclamation Project Based on DEA-Gini Criterion—A Case Study in Qingyang City, Gansu Province

QIAO Hongqiang; XIE Zhongtai; CHENG Wenshi; LIU Xuelu

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Benefit Evaluation on Land Reclamation Project Based on DEA-Gini Criterion—A Case Study in Qingyang City, Gansu Province

- Benefit Evaluation on Land Reclamation Project Based on DEA-Gini Criterion—A Case Study in Qingyang City, Gansu Province
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 37, Issue 1, Pages: 132-136(2017)
- 作者机构：
  
  甘肃农业大学管理学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.024
  CLC：
- Published：2017
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
QIAO Hongqiang, XIE Zhongtai, CHENG Wenshi, et al. Benefit Evaluation on Land Reclamation Project Based on DEA-Gini Criterion—A Case Study in Qingyang City, Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 132-136.
DOI：

QIAO Hongqiang, XIE Zhongtai, CHENG Wenshi, et al. Benefit Evaluation on Land Reclamation Project Based on DEA-Gini Criterion—A Case Study in Qingyang City, Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2017, 37(1): 132-136. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2017.01.024.

摘要

[目的] 评价土地整治项目的实施效益，为其他同类地区土地整治效益评价提供依据。[方法] 利用DEA-Gini准则对甘肃省庆阳市14个土地整治项目的整治综合效益进行定量描述并评价。[结果] 涉及的14个土地整治项目中合水县丑家庄土地整治项目、镇原乡山岔镇土地整治项目和正宁县西坡乡土地整治项目的整治综合效益偏低，分别为0.308，0.378，0.342；宁县南义乡和平子镇土地整治综合效益比较高，分别为0.972，0.708；其余9个土地整治项目的综合效益处于中等水平。[结论] 利用DEA-Gini准则评价结果表明14个土地整治项目的经济效益、社会效益和生态效益都有较大地提升空间。

Abstract

[Objective] The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of land reclamation projects and to provide references for similar land remediation projects. [Methods] We used DEA-Gini criterion to quantitatively describe and evaluate the benefits of 14 land reclamation projects in Qingyang City

Gansu Province. [Results] Among 14 land reclamation projects

the comprehensive benefits of land remediation projects in the Choujiazhuang

Shancha Town of Zhenyuan Township of Heshui County and the Xipo Township of Zhengning County were 0.308

0.378 and 0.342 respectively and at lower levels while the comprehensive benefits were 0.972 and 0.708 respectively in Nanyi Township and Pingzi Town of Ningxian County and reached a higher level. The remaining nine land reclamation projects was in the middle level. [Conclusion] Using DEA-Gini criterion evaluation results showed that there are still space for the improvement of economic

social and ecological benefits in 14 land reclamation projects

关键词

Keywords

references

冯应斌,杨庆媛.转型期中国农村土地综合整治重点领域与基本方向[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):175-182.

管栩,金晓斌,魏东岳,等.土地整治项目综合监测体系构建[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(4):71-77.

程文仕,乔蕻强,刘志,等.基于RAGA-PPC模型的土地整治综合效益评价:以庆阳市15个土地整治项目为例[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):257-261,268.

刘瑞卿,李新旺,张路路,等.基于格序结构的土地整治综合效益评价研究[J].土壤通报,2012,43(6):1305-1310.

危小建,刘耀林,王娜.湖北省土地整治项目空间分异格局[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(4):195-203.

桑玲玲,郧文聚,朱德海,等.北京市大兴区耕地空间重构分析[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(3):452-462.

乔蕻强,程文仕,刘学录.基于条件价值评估法的农业生态补偿意愿及支付水平评估:以甘肃省永登县为例[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):291-297.

黄辉玲,吴次芳,张守忠.黑龙江省土地整治规划效益分析与评价[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):240-246.

罗畅,夏春光,杨庆媛,等.灾毁土地复垦的经济效益研究:以重庆市北碚区为例[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,30(6):1138-1141.

吴冠岑,刘友兆,付光辉.基于熵权可拓物元模型的土地整理项目社会效益评价[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(5):40-46.

徐京京, 黄建武.安徽省耕地资源利用的生态社会效益计算方法及其应用[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):157-162.

朱兰兰,蔡银莺,罗成,等.土地用途管制框架下农户土地利用行为特征及影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):198-206.

严金明,夏素华,夏春云.土地整理效益的分析评价与指标体系的建立[J].国土资源情报,2005(2):36-42.

Views

1134

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Aeolian sand hazards and sand-control system configuration mode in Milan Gobi area along Golmud-Korla railway

Combining 137Cs,210Pb and 7Be to Monitor Benefits from Sediment Reduction by Soil and Water Conservation

Method of Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Land Consolidation Based on Evaluation Model of Matter Element

Benefits of Rainwater Retained by Urban Permeable Surfaces——A Case Study of Dalian City

Benefits Evaluation of Ecological Project in Southern Jiangxi Province During Past 30 Years

Related Author

Peng Xiaochuan

ZHANG Xin-bao

WEI Jie

HE Xiu-bin

GUO Yi-qiang

BAI Zhong-ke

WANG Jun

LI Zheng

Related Institution

Xinjiang Railway Survey and Design Institute

Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, MLR

School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences

Dalian Academy of Reconnaissance and Mapping Co. Ltd.

⁰