Experimental Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Grasslands with Simulated Rainfall in Yili River Valley

ZHONG Yating; ZHANG Wentai; HUANG Junhua; ZHANG Peipei; ZHANG Shaobo; WANG Fei

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Experimental Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Grasslands with Simulated Rainfall in Yili River Valley

- Experimental Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Grasslands with Simulated Rainfall in Yili River Valley
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 36, Issue 6, Pages: 21-25(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
  2. 新疆土壤与植物生态过程实验室新疆农业大学草业与环境科学学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
  3. 新疆农业大学林业研究所,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
  4. 新疆伊犁哈萨克自治州水利局, 新疆伊宁,835000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.004
  CLC：
- Published：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHONG Yating, ZHANG Wentai, HUANG Junhua, et al. Experimental Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Grasslands with Simulated Rainfall in Yili River Valley[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 21-25.
DOI：

ZHONG Yating, ZHANG Wentai, HUANG Junhua, et al. Experimental Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Grasslands with Simulated Rainfall in Yili River Valley[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(6): 21-25. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.06.004.

摘要

[目的] 研究一定降雨条件下，伊犁河谷地区3个不同草地类型径流小区的减流减沙效果，以期为该区的水土保持工作提供借鉴。[方法] 采用野外人工模拟降雨的方法。[结果] （1）几种草地类型初始产流时间的长短依次为：角果藜 > 伊犁蒿 > 狗牙根 > 裸地；（2）径流速率由大到小依次为：裸地 > 伊犁蒿 > 狗牙根 > 角果藜；（3）泥沙含量由大到小依次为：裸地 > 伊犁蒿 > 狗牙根 > 角果藜；（4）狗牙根减流因子的数值处于0.21~0.58之间，伊犁蒿的减流因子处于0.14~0.87之间，角果藜的减流因子则在0.02~0.11之间，狗牙根减沙因子的数值在0.16~0.76之间，角果藜的减沙因子处于0~0.42之间，伊犁蒿的减沙因子则在0.42~0.88之间。[结论] 水土保持效益最好的是角果藜，其次为狗牙根与伊犁蒿，裸地效果最差。

Abstract

[Objective] The reduction effects of runoff and sediment in 3 different grasslands runoff plots were observed under certain rainfall condition in Yili river valley

to provide references for soil and water conservation in the area.[Methods] Method of field artificial rainfall was used.[Results] (1) The occurrences of initial runoff the several grasslands ranked as:Pod quinoa > Yili Artemisia > Bermuda grass > bare land; (2) The runoff of rate ranked as:bare land > Yili Artemisia > Bermuda grass > Pod quinoa; (3) The sediment concentration ranked as:bare land > Yili Artemisia > Bermuda grass > Pod quinoa; (4) The values of flow reduction factor of Pod quinoa

Bermuda grass and Yili Artemisia were 0.02~0.11

0.21~0.58 and 0.14~0.87. The values of sediment reduction factor of Bermuda grass

Pod quinoa and Yili Artemisia were 0.16~0.76

0~0.42 and 0.42~0.88.[Conclusion] Pod quinoa got the best benefit for soil and water conservation

followed by Yili Artemisia and Bermuda grass

bare land performed the worst.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘宝元,郭索彦,谢云,等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):27-32.

杨龙,贺光华.伊犁河流域灌区水土流失防治对策[J].水利发展研究,2006,6(6):33-35.

哈德逊土壤保持[M].窦葆璋,译.北京:科学出版社,1975.

侯喜禄,曹清玉.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区植被减沙效益研究[J].水土保持通报,1990,10(2):33-40.

熊运阜,王宏兴,白志刚,等.梯田、林地、草地减水减沙效益指标初探[J].中国水土保持,1996(8):10-14.

罗伟祥,白立强,宋西德,等.不同覆盖度林地和草地的径流量与冲刷量[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(1):30-34.

史银志.基于人工模拟降雨的伊宁市北山坡土壤侵蚀特性试验及预报模型研究[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2008.

王大庆.新疆天池自然保护区产流产沙试验研究[D].新疆石河子:石河子大学,2009.

桑盛国,张锐.新疆山区性流域植被措施水土保持探讨[J].水利科技与经济,2012,18(9):42-44,50.

Zhang Junmin. Study on the soil development rule in Yili river basin[J]. Journal of Shihezi University:Natural Science, 2005,23(5):583-587.

陈正达,袁咏,张海峰.新疆伊犁哈萨克州水土流失现状及防治对策[J].水土保持应用技术,2003(2):18-20.

付艳红,时铁彬,徐岩.含沙量测量方法及比较分析[J].东北水利水电,2010,28(9):35-36.

Ghidey F,Alberts E E. Plant root effects on soil erosion,splash detachment, and aggregate stabiand aggregate stability[J]. Transaction of the ASAE, 1997,40(1):129-135.

赵护兵,刘国彬,曹清玉.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型对水土流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(2):153-155.

Liu Han, Lei Tingwu, Zhao Jun,et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and antecedent soil water content onsoil infiltrate ability under rainfall condition using the run off-on-out method[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011,396(1/2):24-32.

张清春,刘宝元,翟刚.植被与水土流失研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(4):96-101.

Chen Liding, Huang Zhilin, Gong Jie, et al. The effect of land cover/vegetation on soil waterdynamic in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2007,70(2):200-208.

王秋生.植被控制土壤侵蚀的数学模型及其应用[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(4):68-72.

任志远,刘焱序.西北地区植被保持土壤效应评估[J].资源科学,2013,35(3):610-617.

Views

1124

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Soil and water conservation effects of two urban shrubs under simulated rainfall conditions

A bibliometric analysis on research progress of soil and water loss monitoring technology during 1993—2023

Characteristics of soil resistance to erosion and scouring， and their influencing factors in Dabie Mountains of western Anhui Province

Effect and Countermeasures of Reconstruction Project to Increasing Speed of Lanzhou-Xinjiang Railroad on Soil and Water Loss in Wind-sand Area

Land Degradation of Slope Fields in Hilly and Gully Areas of Loess Plateau

Related Author

Hu Jing

Ma Jiangang

Zhao Tonghui

Wang Xinyu

Chen Juanjuan

Zhong Yunfei

Wang Dichen

Xiao Zhicai

Related Institution

College of Soil and Water Conservation， Southwest Forestry University

Zhanyi Karst Ecosystem Positioning Observation;Research Station， National Forestry and Grassland Administration

Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Center of Songliao River;Basin， Songliao Water Resources Commission

College of Water Conservancy， North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power

College of Geographical Science， Harbin Normal University

⁰