Evaluation of Potential Soil Erosion Risk in Key Harnessing Areas of Jinghe and Beiluo River Upstream Based on GIS

WANG Kai; MA Jinhui; XIA Yanqiu; DANG Junxiao; LIU Fei

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.063

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation of Potential Soil Erosion Risk in Key Harnessing Areas of Jinghe and Beiluo River Upstream Based on GIS

- Evaluation of Potential Soil Erosion Risk in Key Harnessing Areas of Jinghe and Beiluo River Upstream Based on GIS
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 36, Issue 2, Pages: 343-348(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 兰州大学资源环境学院,甘肃,兰州,730000
  2. 西安通信学院,陕西,西安,710106
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.063
  CLC：
- Published：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Kai, MA Jinhui, XIA Yanqiu, et al. Evaluation of Potential Soil Erosion Risk in Key Harnessing Areas of Jinghe and Beiluo River Upstream Based on GIS[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 343-348.
DOI：

WANG Kai, MA Jinhui, XIA Yanqiu, et al. Evaluation of Potential Soil Erosion Risk in Key Harnessing Areas of Jinghe and Beiluo River Upstream Based on GIS[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 343-348. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.063.

摘要

[目的

]

对泾河北洛河上游重点治理区土壤侵蚀潜在危险度进行评价

为该区土壤侵蚀研究提供参考。[方法

]

在GIS支持下

利用高分辨率遥感影像土地利用解译结果

采用中国土壤流失方程(CSLE)与抗蚀年限法相结合

同时利用土壤侵蚀潜在危险度指数(SEPDI)对不同坡度地区或地类土壤侵蚀潜在危险度的大小进行评价。[结果

]

利用CSLE定量计算得到陕西省吴起县的年均侵蚀模数为1 317.5 t/(km

·a)

属轻度侵蚀

其土壤侵蚀潜在危险度也较小

以无险型和轻险型为主

平均SPEDI值为1.25。[结论

]

研究区内大于25°的坡度范围将是今后重点治理的区域;另外研究区内人为水土流失比较严重

建议适当减少工矿用地以及建筑用地的开挖量。

Abstract

[Objective] The potential soil erosion risk in the key harnessing areas of Jinghe and Beiluo River upstream was assessed to provide references for soil erosion researches. [Methods] Based on the interpretation results of high-resolution remote sensing images and the assistant of GIS

the Chinese soil loss equation and the method of soil anti-erosion years were used to assess the potential risk of lands with different slope gradient and land use type by SPEDI index. [Results] The average soil erosion modules of Wuqi County was 1 317.5 t/(km2·a)

which belonged to slight erosion level. The risk was assessed at slight or no danger level

and the average SPEDI is 1.25. [Conclusion] In some districts

soil erosion might be serious especially when the slope is larger than 25 degrees

and these districts need to be intensively harnessed in the future. In addition

the excavation work of mine and construction of land were proposed to be diminished because most serious soil erosion was caused by human.

关键词

Keywords

references

孙希华,闫业超.济南市土壤侵蚀潜在危险度分级及侵蚀背景的空间分析[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(4):80-83.

闵婕,杨华,赵纯勇. GIS支持下的土壤侵蚀潜在危险度分级方法研究及应用[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(4):61-64.

Zuidam R A V, Zuidam-Cancelado F I V. Terrain Analysis and Classification Using Aerial Photographs:A Geomorphological Approach[M]. International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), 1979.

CORINE. Soil Erosion Risk and Important Land Resources in the Southern Regions of the European Community[R]. Luxembourg:EUR13233, 1992.

Jong S M D, Paracchini M L, Bertolo F, et al. Regional assessment of soil erosion using the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data[J]. Catena, 1999, 37(3/4):291-308.

郭志民,陈志伟.应用GIS方法对土壤侵蚀潜在危险性进行评价及其时空分布特征研究[J].福建水土保持,1999,11(4):40-45.

史志华,蔡崇法,蔡强国,等.GIS支持下土壤侵蚀潜在危险度的分级研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,11(2):190-193.

万军,蔡运龙,路云阁,等.喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀风险评价:以贵州省关岭布依族苗族自治县为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(3):148-153.

黄金,蔡强国,陈浩,等.土壤侵蚀危险度评价方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):143-147.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses:A Guide to Conservation Planning[M]. US Washington D C:Agriculture Handbook No 537, 1978.

Peele T C. The relation of certain physical characteristics to the erodibility of soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1938(S):97-100.

张科利,彭文英,杨红丽.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.

Mccool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE:American Society of Agricultural Engineers (USA), 1987, 30(5):1387-1396.

Liu Baoyuan, Nearing M A, Risse L M. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994, 37(6):1835-1840.

郭建英,李锦荣,刘铁军,等.退耕还林工程建设对吴起县土地利用/覆被变化及其土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):1-6.

谢红霞.延河流域土壤侵蚀时空变化及水土保持环境效应评价研究[D].陕西西安:陕西师范大学,2008.

李勋贵,魏霞.区域土壤侵蚀演化风险分析:以泾河流域为例[J].地理研究,2011,30(8):1361-1369.

石生新,蒋定生.几种水土保持措施对强化降水入渗和减沙的影响试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,9(1):82-88.

李斌兵,郑粉莉,龙栋材,等.基于GIS纸坊沟小流域土壤侵蚀强度空间分布[J].地理科学,2009,29(1):105-110.

Views

1803

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatiotemporal Pattern and Dynamic Changes of Soil Erosion in Harbin Region of Songhuajiang Watershed

Impacts of rainfall and vegetation on soil erosion in Dabie Mountains forest reform area

Simulation of soil erosion resistance and soil erosion process in arid valley region of southeastern Xizang Autonomous Region

Soil erosion in northern foothills of Qinling Mountains （Xi’an section） from 2010 to 2023

Research progress on soil amendments for controlling soil erosion in red soil region of southern China

Related Author

GONG Wen-feng

CAI Ti-jiu

FAN Wen-yi

Li Gao

Luo Minxuan

Huo Zhitao

Chen Rui

Peng Yi

Related Institution

College of Hydro-power, Heilongjiang University

College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University

Changsha General Survey of Natural Resources Center， China Geological Survey， Ningxiang

Huangshan Observation and Research Station for Land-water Resources

School of Soil and Water Conservation， Beijing Forestry University

⁰