Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River

ZHAO Zhenya; JI Baolin; SONG Xiaoyuan; LI Chao; QIAO Nan

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River

- Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 36, Issue 1, Pages: 143-150(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
  2. 鄂尔多斯市水土保持局,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.025
  CLC：
- Published：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHAO Zhenya, JI Baolin, SONG Xiaoyuan, et al. Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 143-150.
DOI：

ZHAO Zhenya, JI Baolin, SONG Xiaoyuan, et al. Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 143-150. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.025.

摘要

[目的] 对区域综合治理现状进行评估

为政府制定政策提供相关理论依据. [方法] 将DPSIR概念模型引入流域综合治理生态环境效应评价指标体系

并运用AHP-熵权法和TOPSIS法对黄河内蒙古段十大孔兑综合治理现状进行生态环境效应评估. [结果] 十大孔兑综合治理现状评价值由高到低为:罕台川> 西柳沟> 哈什拉川> 呼斯太河> 毛不拉> 木哈尔河> 东柳沟> 卜尔嘎色太沟> 黑濑沟> 壕庆河.综合效应指数呈中间高

两边低的趋势

仅罕台川等级为Ⅱ级

其他孔兑都为Ⅳ级

各孔兑整体上生态环境效应指数较低

综合治理现状较差. [结论] DPSIR-TOPSIS模型内部结构清晰

较好地解释了流域综合治理工程与环境—经济—社会系统间的内在联系

评价方法采取了主客观相结合的方法

也更为合理

为流域综合治理生态环境效应提供了一种新的方法和思路.

Abstract

[Objective] To assess the benefits of comprehensive management and provide support for government policy making. [Methods] The concept of DPSIR model was introduced into the eco-environment benefit evaluation index system. AHP-entropy and TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the eco-environment benefit of the comprehensive management in ten tributaries in Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River. [Results] Value of the integrated management in ten tributaries from highest to lowest was: Hantaichuang > Xiliugou > Hashilachuang > Husitaihe > Maobula > Muhaerhe > Dongliugou > Boergasetaigou > Heilaigou > Haoqinghe. The comprehensive effect index was high in the middle

but low in both sides. Hantaichuan was class Ⅱ

while the other tributaries was class Ⅳ

and the comprehensive management in this region was poor. [Conclusion] The internal structure of the DPSIR-TOPSIS model was clear

and it well explained the intrinsic link between watershed comprehensive management engineering and environment-economy-society system. This study provides a new method for assessing the eco-environment benefit of comprehensive management.

关键词

Keywords

references

李生宝.半干旱黄土丘陵区退化生态系统恢复技术与模式[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.

姬宝霖,申向东,吕志远,等.利用高含沙洪水治沙淤地的土壤养分、粒径分布特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):69-72.

索全义,姬宝霖,高聚林,等.高泥沙洪水淤地治沙后土壤养分分布特征的分析[J].华北农学报,2007,22(5):134-137.

赵振亚,姬宝霖,宋小园,等.基于层次分析和模糊数学法的公乌素土壤质量评价[J].干旱区研究,2014,31(6):1010-1016.

宋小园,朱仲元,韩永明,等.基于改进的突变级数法在复垦区土壤质量恢复评价中的应用[J].干旱区地理,2014,37(5):1012-1017.

徐燕,周华荣.初论我国生态环境质量评价研究进展[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(2):166-172.

周华荣,潘伯荣,海热提·吐尔逊.新疆生态环境现状综合评价研究[J].干旱区地理,2001,24(1):23-29.

岳天祥,淦九河.生态环境质量评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,1993,7(4):33-37,43.

张峥,朱琳,张建文,等.我国湿地生态质量评价方法的研究[J].中国环境科学,2000(S1):55-58.

国庆喜,王天明.丰林自然保护区景观生态评价:量化与解释[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(5):825-832.

许明祥,刘国彬,赵允格.黄土丘陵区土壤质量评价指标研究关[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(10):1843-1848.

Yin Runsheng, Yin Guiping, Li Lanying. Assessing China's ecological restoration programs: What's been done and what remains to be done[J]. Environmental Management, 2010,45(3):442-453.

何兴照.小流域综合评价方法与模型研究[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2008.

王兵,张光辉,刘国彬,等.黄土高原丘陵区水土流失综合治理生态环境效应评价[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(20):150-161.

王兵,刘国彬,张光辉,等.黄土丘陵区中尺度流域水土流失治理环境效应评估[J].农业机械学报, 2012,43(7):28-35.

OCSE. Environmental Indicators: A preliminary Set[M]. Washington D C: Congressional Information Service, 1991.

Pearce D, Hamilton K, Atkinson G. Measuring sustainable development: Progress on indicators[J]. Environment and Development Economics, 1996,1(1):85-101.

Agency. E E. Effectiveness of Urban Wastewater Treatment Policies in Selected Countries[M]. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2005.

Jeunesse I L, Rounsevell M, Vanclooster M. Delivering a DSS tool to a river contract: A way to implement the participatory approach principle at the catchment scale[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2003,28(12):547-554.

Giupponi C, Mysiak J, Fassio A, et al. MULINO-DSS: A computer tool for sustainable use of water resources at the catchment scale[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2004,64(1):13-24.

李鹏,刘澄玉,李丽萍,等.多尺度多变量模糊熵分析[J].物理学报,2013,62(12):1205121-1205129.

吴杰康,祝宇楠,韦善革,等.采用改进隶属度函数的梯级水电站多目标优化调度模型[J].电网技术,2011,35(2),48-52.

倪九派,李萍,魏朝富,等.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价[J].农业机械学报,2009,25(5):202-209.

章海波,骆永明,赵其国,等.香港土壤研究Ⅵ基于改进层次分析法的土壤肥力质量综合评价[J].土壤学报,2006,43(4):577-583.

邹志红,孙靖南,任广平.模糊评价因子的熵权法赋权及其在水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(4):552-556.

龙腾锐,赵欣,林于廉,等. M-AHP-熵权组合赋权法在垃圾渗滤液处理技术评价中的应用[J].环境工程学报,2010,4(11):2455-2460.

李灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰,基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):217-227.

胡永宏.对TOPSIS法用于综合评价的改进[J].数学的实践与认识,2002,32(4):572-575.

董璟琦,杨晓华,杨海真,等.基于改进TOPSIS法的规划环评情景方案建立方法及应用[J].环境科学与管理,2009,34(7):162-169.

Views

1170

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Evaluation and Prediction of Land Carrying Capacity in Anhui Province Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model

Water Resource Vulnerability Assessment of Changchun City Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model

Evaluation of Ecological Carrying Capacity in Qinghai Province Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model

Review on Vegetation Restoration on Nutrient Changes in Watershed of Loess Hilly Region

Impacts of climate， land use and ecological governance on water ecosystem services in Haihe River basin

Related Author

WANG Wenwen

ZHU Yanna

XIA Yeling

HE Gang

Du Shanghai

Zhang Wenjing

He Hong

Zhu Yifan

Related Institution

School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Science & Technology

Changchun Municipal Water Bureau

College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University

Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University

Qinghai Provincial Land and Space Planning Research Institute

⁰