Effects of Fruit and Grass Intercropping on Soil Microbial Biomass C, N and Soil Enzyme Activities in Hilly Lands of Southern China

YAO Yuefeng; XU Guangping; HUANG Yuqing; MO Ling

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Fruit and Grass Intercropping on Soil Microbial Biomass C, N and Soil Enzyme Activities in Hilly Lands of Southern China

- Effects of Fruit and Grass Intercropping on Soil Microbial Biomass C, N and Soil Enzyme Activities in Hilly Lands of Southern China
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 35, Issue 6, Pages: 53-57(2015)
- 作者机构：
  
  广西壮族自治区中国科学院广西植物研究所广西喀斯特植物保育与恢复生态学重点实验室,广西,桂林,541006
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.009
  CLC：
- Published：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
YAO Yuefeng, XU Guangping, HUANG Yuqing, et al. Effects of Fruit and Grass Intercropping on Soil Microbial Biomass C, N and Soil Enzyme Activities in Hilly Lands of Southern China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 53-57.
DOI：

YAO Yuefeng, XU Guangping, HUANG Yuqing, et al. Effects of Fruit and Grass Intercropping on Soil Microbial Biomass C, N and Soil Enzyme Activities in Hilly Lands of Southern China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 53-57. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.009.

摘要

[目的] 探究不同果草套种模式下0-10 cm土层土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的差异

为改善土壤肥力条件、促进桂林旅游城市生态循环农业经济的发展提供理论依据。[方法] 在桂林潮田河流域大山口农业综合示范区内设置样地

采集表层(0-10 cm)土壤样品

测定与分析不同果草套种模式下表层土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的差异。[结果] 0-10 cm土层土壤氮磷钾、土壤微生物量碳氮和土壤酶活性大小基本表现为:阳朔金桔+牧草 >桂橙1号+牧草 >翠冠梨+牧草 >对照样地。其中

阳朔金桔+牧草模式对0-10 cm土层土壤微生物量碳、氮含量和土壤酶活性的影响最为明显(p<0.05)。相关性分析表明

土壤微生物量碳氮和3种土壤酶活性存在极显著正相关关系。[结论] 果草套种模式特别是阳朔金桔+牧草模式对南方丘陵山地表层土壤肥力条件的改善作用较为明显。

Abstract

[Objection] Differences of soil microbial biomass carbon

nitrogen and soil enzyme activities in different patterns of fruit and grass intercropping were compared in order to provide a support for soil fertility melioration and agriculture modernization.[Methods] Top soil layer(0-10 cm) from four patterns of fruit and grass intercropping was sampled in sites of Dashankou comprehensive agriculture demonstration zone

which located at Chaotian watershed of Guilin area. Variance and correlation analyses were used to compare the differences of soil microbial biomass carbon

nitrogen and soil enzyme activities.[Result] Soil total nitrogen

total phosphorus

total potassium and their available components

soil microbial biomass carbon

nitrogen and soil enzyme activities behaved almost similar ranks as:Fortunella margarita+grass >Guicheng No.1+grass >Pyrus spp+grass >control plot. Pattern of Fortunella margarita+grass intercropping had significant effects on soil microbial biomass carbon

nitrogen and soil enzyme activities(p<0.05). This pattern ameliorated soil better than other patterns did. There existed positive correlations between soil microbial biomass carbon

biomass nitrogen and soil enzyme activities.[Conclusion] Fruit and grass intercropping

especially the pattern of Fortunella margarita+grass

had significant effects on soil amelioration in hilly lands in the southern of China.

关键词

Keywords

references

Zelles L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil:A review[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999,29(2):111-129.

赵先丽,吕国红,于文颖,等.辽宁省不同土地利用对土壤微生物量碳氮的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(10):1966-1970.

Caldwell B A. Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity:A review[J]. Pedobiologia, 2005,49(6):637-644.

García R R, Ochoa V, Hinojosa M B, et al. Suitability of enzyme activities for the monitoring of soil quality improvement in organic agricultural systems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40(9):2137-2145.

Sinsabaugh R L, Lauber C L, Weintraub M N, et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale[J]. Ecology Letters, 2008,11(11):1252-1264.

张娟,吴宏亮,康建宏,等.不同种植模式对新压砂瓜田土壤养分和土壤酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2014,32(2):107-113.

Burke D J, Weintraub M N, Hewins C R, et al. Relationship between soil enzyme activities, nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011,43(4):795-803.

周晓兵,张元明,陶冶,等.古尔班通古特沙漠土壤酶活性和微生物量氮对模拟氮沉降的响应[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3340-3349.

刘丽丹,谢应忠,邱开阳,等.宁夏盐池沙地3种植物群落土壤酶活性变化的初步研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(4):153-156.

曾丹娟,黄玉清,莫凌,等.果园套种牧草地上生物量的动态变化及其对土壤肥力的影响[J].草业科学,2011,28(12):2170-2174.

寇建村,杨文权,朝明玉,等.关中地区果草系统产草量与对杂草的控制[J].草业科学,2013,30(3):436-446.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.

Brookes P C, Landman A, Pruden G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen:A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985,17(6):837-842.

关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.

刘传和,陈杰忠.我国果园生草栽培研究概况[J].亚热带植物科学,2005,34(2):76-80.

宋同清,王克林,彭晚霞,等.亚热带丘陵茶园间作白三叶草的生态效应[J].生态学报,2006,26(11):3647-3655.

董荣书,张洁,黄艳霞,等.热研2号柱花草高效固氮根瘤菌的筛选[J].热带作物学报,2013,34(7):1247-1251.

向佐湘,肖润林,王久荣,等.间种白三叶草对亚热带茶园土壤生态系统的影响[J].草业学报,2008,17(1):29-35.

俞慎,王俊华,李振高,等.四种不同植被覆盖下的红壤微生物量碳、氮的差异[J].中国农业大学学报,1997,2(S):74-78.

王光华,金剑,韩晓增,等.不同土地管理方式对黑土土壤微生物量碳和酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(6):1275-1280.

王树起,韩晓增,乔云发,等.不同土地利用和施肥方式对土壤酶活性及相关肥力因子的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(6):1311-1316.

Views

1271

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatial Characteristics of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen in Datong Reclaimed Coal Mine Area of Huainan Region

Effects of Different Amount of Topdressing Urea on Soil Organic Carbon and Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Multi-cropping Rape After Wheat Planted

Soil Microbial Counts and Enzyme Activities on Rail may Slope

Spatial Variation of Soil Inorganic Phosphorus Forms and Soil Enzyme Activities Under Different Land Use Types

Relations of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Soil Enzyme Activities with Plant C and N in Yulin Area of North Shaanxi Province

Related Author

ZHANG Jie-qiong

FANG Feng-man

YU Jian

JIANG Pei-long

DENG Zheng-wei

LIN Yue-sheng

YANG Wenyuan

DONG Bo

Related Institution

Anhui Key Laboratory of Natural Disaster Process and Prevention

College of Territorial Resources and Tourism, Anhui Normal University

Gansu Agriculture Environment Protection Station

Gansu Engineering Research Center for Smart Agriculture(GERCSA)

Key Laboratory of High Efficiency Water Utilization in Dry Farming Region, Dryland Agriculture Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences

⁰