Eco-environment Sensitivity Evaluation of Mining Areas Based on TOPSIS

WANG Zhanjun; ZHANG Yueguo; SHI Songyun; CHEN Yaheng

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Eco-environment Sensitivity Evaluation of Mining Areas Based on TOPSIS

- Eco-environment Sensitivity Evaluation of Mining Areas Based on TOPSIS
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 35, Issue 2, Pages: 225-230(2015)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北农业大学资源与环境科学学院,河北,保定,071001
  2. 河北省易县水务局,河北,保定,074200
  3. 河北省保定市土地开发整理中心,河北,保定,071001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.043
  CLC：
- Published：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Zhanjun, ZHANG Yueguo, SHI Songyun, et al. Eco-environment Sensitivity Evaluation of Mining Areas Based on TOPSIS[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 225-230.
DOI：

WANG Zhanjun, ZHANG Yueguo, SHI Songyun, et al. Eco-environment Sensitivity Evaluation of Mining Areas Based on TOPSIS[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 225-230. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.043.

摘要

[目的] 对河北省保定市涞源县13个主要矿区进行生态环境敏感性评价

旨在为矿区生态环境评价和治理提供理论基础和技术保障。[方法] 通过PSR框架模型建立矿区生态环境敏感性评价指标体系

并引入理想点(TOPSIS)法。[结果] (1)空间布局上

涞源县南部矿区生态环境质量较差

中部矿区中等

而北部矿区较好;(2)具体矿区上

塔崖驿乡矿区、东团堡乡矿区生环境敏感性最好

而乌龙沟乡矿区最差。[结论] 引入TOPSIS法进行小尺度县域矿区范围内生态环境敏感性评价

评价过程简便易行

可操作性强

且不受评价指标个数的影响

评价结果更加准确、客观、实用

能很好地反映涞源县各矿区生态环境的优劣程度及区域差异。

Abstract

[Objective] This paper aimed to provide the theoretical basis and technical support for evaluation and management of ecological environment in mining area based on a evaluation case study of the ecological sensitivities of 13 major mining areas in Laiyuan County of Baoding City

Hebei Province.[Methods] PSR model was applied for ecological sensitivity evaluation. And also technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) method was introduced into the evaluation process.[Results] (1) The space layout of the ecological environment quality in Laiyuan County showed a radial incremental feature existed from the southeast to the northwest; (2) In term of the sensitivity difference of the mining area

the ecological environmental sensitivities of township of Tayayi and Dongtuanbao mining were better

and the sensitivity of Wulonggou mining area was worse.[Conclusion] The introduced evaluation of the TOPSIS method for the evaluation of ecological sensitivity of mining area had some obvious advantages. It can make the evaluation process simple

operable and less relayed on the evaluation index number. All of these make the evaluation result more accurate

objective and practical

and furthermore

the results can well describe expound the merits of each mine's ecological level and regional difference.

关键词

Keywords

references

任忠宝,王世虎,唐宇,等.矿产资源需求拐点理论与峰值预测[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1480-1489.

陶知翔,成先雄,赵美珍.矿山环境问题与防治对策[J].金属矿山,2008,37(1):103-106.

孙才志,杨磊,胡冬玲.基于GIS的下辽河平原地下水生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7428-7440.

Carrington D P, Gallimore R G, Kutzbach J E. Climate sensitivity to wetlands and wetland vegetation in mid-Holocene North Africa[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2001, 17(2/3):151-157.

Horne R, Hickey J. Ecological sensitivity of Australian rainforests to selective logging[J]. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1991, 16(1):119-129.

Muzik I. Sensitivity of hydrologic systems to climate change[J]. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 2001, 26(2):233-252.

Rodriguez E, Vila L. Ecological sensitivity atlas of the Argentine continental shelf[J]. International Hydrographic Review, Monaco, 1992, 69(2):47-53.

Tao Fulu, Feng Zongwei. Terrestrial ecosystem sensitivity to acid deposition in South China[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2000, 118(3/4):231-243.

Driscoll C T, Lawrence G B, Bulger A J, et al. Acidic deposition in the Northeastern United States:Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies:The effects of acidic deposition in the northeastern United States include the acidification of soil and water, which stresses terrestrial and aquatic biota[J]. BioScience, 2001, 51(3):180-198.

王月健,徐海量,王成,等.过去30a玛纳斯河流域生态安全格局与农业生产力演变[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2539-2549.

宋晓龙,李晓文,白军红,等.黄河三角洲国家级自然保护区生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):4836-4846.

钟林生,唐承财,郭华.基于生态敏感性分析的金银滩草原景区旅游功能区划[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1813-1819.

杨月圆,王金亮,杨丙丰.云南省土地生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2253-2260.

吴金华,李纪伟,朱鸿儒.基于ArcGIS区统计的延安市土地生态敏感性评价[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1180-1188.

黄静,崔胜辉,李方一,等.厦门市土地利用变化下的生态敏感性[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7441-7449.

曹建军,刘永娟.GIS支持下上海城市生态敏感性分析[J].应用生态学报,2010(7):1805-1812.

舒欢,刘文娜.基于组合赋权-TOPSIS模型的水利工程建设方案优选决策方法[J].工程管理学报,2013,27(4):83-86.

崔和瑞,梁丽华,王立红.基于熵权TOPSIS分析的配电网可靠性评估指标体系[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):172-175.

韩瑞玲,佟连军,宋亚楠.基于生态效率的辽宁省循环经济分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(16):4732-4740.

陈西蕊,张蓉珍.基于PSR-TOPSIS法的区域土地资源生态安全动态分析:以陕西省为例[J].贵州农业科学,2011,39(1):223-227.

郭旭东,邱扬,连纲,等.基于PSR框架,针对土壤侵蚀小流域的土地质量评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(9):1884-1894.

贺三维,潘鹏,王海军,等.基于PSR和云理论的农用地生态环境评价[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(8):1346-1352.

Views

1240

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Wind Erosion and Conservation at Mining Area in Gobi Desert

Soil and Water Loss During Urbanization in Loess Plateau Area and Its Impact on Eco-environment——Setting Yan'an City as an Example

Eco-environmental Impacts Analysis of Flood Control Projects on Lower Reaches of Yellow River

Regional Division of Ecological Reconstruction in Mining Area for Soil and Water Conservation of Liaoning Province

Eco-environmental Effects of Natural Gas Pipeline Project and Protection Countermeasures in Middle-low Mountainous Area

Related Author

ZHOU Bo

FENG Wei

ZHANG Xin-he

LI Jing

BAO Zhong-mo

LIU Xian-chun

XU Xian-li

LI Shu-bin

Related Institution

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation

College of Water Resources and Architecture, Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling District

School of Geography and Remote Sensing Science, Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Normal University

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation of Liaoning ProvinceChaoyangLiaoning 122000China

Shaanxi Environmental Science Research and Design Institute

⁰