Root Tensile Mechanism Comparison of Three Aboriginal Plants in Central-western Inner Mongolia Area

ZUO Zhiyan; Gerile; Wurentuya; WANG Juan

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Root Tensile Mechanism Comparison of Three Aboriginal Plants in Central-western Inner Mongolia Area

- Root Tensile Mechanism Comparison of Three Aboriginal Plants in Central-western Inner Mongolia Area
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 35, Issue 2, Pages: 52-57(2015)
- 作者机构：
  
  内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010019
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.011
  CLC：
- Published：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZUO Zhiyan, Gerile, Wurentuya, et al. Root Tensile Mechanism Comparison of Three Aboriginal Plants in Central-western Inner Mongolia Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 52-57.
DOI：

ZUO Zhiyan, Gerile, Wurentuya, et al. Root Tensile Mechanism Comparison of Three Aboriginal Plants in Central-western Inner Mongolia Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 52-57. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.011.

摘要

[目的] 研究内蒙古中西部地区3种乡土植物种根系的抗拉机理

为该区水土保持的树种选择提供依据。[方法] 以内蒙古中西部地区3种常见植物柠条、沙棘和紫花苜蓿根系为对象

进行室内单根瞬时极限拉伸试验研究。[结果] (1)3种植物单根极限抗拉力随着直径的增加而增大

单根极限抗拉强度随直径的增加均呈幂函数递减。(2)当直径在0.19 mm~2.89 mm范围内相同径级时

3种植物单根极限抗拉强度和弹性模量均值大小顺序相同

依次为:柠条 >沙棘 >紫花苜蓿

3种植物根径≤0.5 mm的细根具有较大的极限抗拉强度和弹性模量;(3)同一树种当根系直径相同时

土壤含水率高则其单根平均极限抗拉强度小。[结论] 根系的力学特性与形态结构特征的结合

是选择适宜的水土保持树种非常重要的因素。从根系抗拉性能方面评价3种植物根系固土抗蚀能力大小则柠条优于沙棘和紫花苜蓿。

Abstract

[Objective] Root tensible mechanism of three aboriginal plants in the Central-western Inner Mongolia area was studied to provide references of species selection for soil and water consvervation.[Methods] Single root tension of three common plants of the midwest regions of Inner Mongolia area

Hippophae rhamnoides

Caragana korshinskii and Medicago sativa were tested with indoor instantaneous ultimate method.[Results] (1) Single root transient ultimate tensile strength of the plants increased with diameter; single root ultimate tensile strength decreased by power function with diameter increased; (2) When the root diameters were in the same size class between 0.19~2.89 mm

three species' single root transient ultimate tensile strength and modulus of elasticity ranked as:Hippophae rhamnoides >Caragana Korshinskii >Medicago sativa when the three plants' root diameter were less than 0.5 mm

the fine root had greater ultimate tensile strength and modulus of elasticity; (3) When the same tree species had the same root diameter

if soil had high moisture content

the average tensile strength of single was small.[Conclusion] It is important to consider both morphological characteristics and mechanical properties when choosing appropriate species for soil and water conservation. The levels of root reinforcement erosion resistance of Caragana korshinskii were better than that of Hippophae rhamnoides and Medicago sativa.

关键词

Keywords

references

Coppin N J, Richares I G. Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering[M]. London:Butterworths, 1990.

Gray D H. Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization:A Practical Guide for Erosion Control[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

Norris J E. Root reinforcement by Hawthorn and Oak roots on a highway cut-slope in Southern England[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 278(1/2):43-53.

Bischetti G B, Chiaradia E A, Simonato T, et al. Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy)[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 278(1/2):11-22.

熊燕梅,夏汉平,李志安,等.植物根系固坡抗蚀的效应与机理研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(4):895-904.

杨永红,刘淑珍,王成华,等.浅层滑坡生物治理中的乔木根系抗拉实验研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):138-140.

刘定辉,李勇.植物根系提高土壤抗侵蚀性机理研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):34-37.

解明曙.林木根系固坡土力学机制研究[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(3):7-14.

朱清科,陈丽华.贡嘎山森林生态系统根系固土力学机制研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):64-67.

张东升.长江上游暗针叶林林木根系抗拉力学特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2002.

Genet M, Stokes A, Salin F, et al. The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005,278(1/2):1-9.

李绍才,孙海龙,杨志荣,等.护坡植物根系与岩体相互作用的力学特性[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(10):2051-2057.

Docker B B, Hubble T C T. Quantifying root-reinforcement of river bank soils by four Australian tree species[J]. Geomorphology, 2008,100(3):401-418.

阿部和时,岩元贤.用树木根系的抗拉强度测定根系固定坡面的作用[J].水土保持科技情报,1992(4):53-57.

杨维西,黄治江.黄土高原九个水土保持树种根的抗拉力[J].中国水土保持,1988(9):47-49.

周跃,张军,骆华松,等.松属、青冈属乔木侧根的强度在防护林固土护坡作用中的意义[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(1):105-109.

史敏华,王棣.石灰岩区主要水保灌木根系分布特征与根抗拉力研究初报[J].山西林业科技,1994(1):17-19.

Operstein V, Frydman S. The influence of vegetation on soil strength[J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Ground Improvement, 2000,4(2):81-89.

De Baets S, Poesen J, Reubens B, et al. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008, 305(1/2):207-226.

Mattia C, Bischetti G B, Gentile F. Biotechnical characteristics of root systems of typical Mediterranean species[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 278(1/2):23-32.

程洪,颜传盛,李建庆,等.草本植物根系网的固土机制模式与力学试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(1):62-65.

耿威,王林和,刘静,等.鄂尔多斯高原3种4龄-5龄灌木根系抗拉特性初步研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,29(3):86-89.

朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原黄土区护坡灌木植物根系力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(S2):3445-3452.

刘国彬,蒋定生,朱显谟.黄土区草地根系生物力学特性研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(3):21-28.

Coutts M P. Root architecture and tree stability[J]. Plant and Soil, 1983, 71(1/3):171-188.

格日乐,额尔敦花,宋想斌,等.6种水土保持植物枝条的数量特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(6):71-76.

伯姆,德榕,协麟.根系研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.

马红燕,格日乐,赵杏花.排土场2种灌木根系数量特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):156-159.

吕春娟,陈丽华,周硕,等.不同乔木根系的抗拉力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):329-335.

程洪,张新全.草本植物根系网固土原理的力学试验探究[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(5):20-23.

赵丽兵,张宝贵.紫花苜蓿和马唐根的生物力学性能及相关因素的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(9):7-12.

李勇著.黄土高原植物根系与土壤抗冲性[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.

苑淑娟.4种植物单根抗拉力学特性的研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.

张永亮.沙棘根系生物力学特性研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011.

Views

1090

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Impacts of rainfall and vegetation on soil erosion in Dabie Mountains forest reform area

Water Storage of Main Trees Under Storm Conditions in Beijing Mountain Area

Optimal Burial Depth of Soil Moisture Sensors for Tomato-plangting Field

Soil Structure and Water Transport Capacity at Different Altitudes in Jiufeng Area

Application of Groasis Water-saving Afforestation Technology of Holland in Minqin Desert Area

Related Author

Xiang Kui

Li Zhen

Wu Xin

Peng Yi

Chen Rui

Huo Zhitao

Luo Minxuan

Li Gao

Related Institution

Huangshan Observation and Research Station for Land-water Resources

Changsha General Survey of Natural Resources Center， China Geological Survey， Ningxiang

Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation & Desertification Combating of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University

Beijing Water Conservancy School

Beijing Hydrologic Station

⁰