A Study on Eco-compensation Framework Based on Water Quality and Quantity in Huaihe River Basin

ZHANG Xiao-lei; WAN Yi

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.067

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A Study on Eco-compensation Framework Based on Water Quality and Quantity in Huaihe River Basin

- A Study on Eco-compensation Framework Based on Water Quality and Quantity in Huaihe River Basin
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 33, Issue 4, Pages: 275-279(2014)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京大学环境科学与工程学院,北京,100871
  2. 水利部淮河水利委员会,安徽,蚌埠,233001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.067
  CLC：
- Published：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHANG Xiao-lei, WAN Yi. A Study on Eco-compensation Framework Based on Water Quality and Quantity in Huaihe River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 275-279.
DOI：

ZHANG Xiao-lei, WAN Yi. A Study on Eco-compensation Framework Based on Water Quality and Quantity in Huaihe River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 275-279. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.067.

摘要

淮河流域呈现水质型和水量型缺水状况。针对该流域现行生态补偿政策在实施过程中存在概念界定不清

区域局限性及补偿方式单一性的问题

在分析淮河流域水污染生态补偿政策实施现状的基础上

提出了基于水质-水量的生态补偿框架

并从核算标准、组织方式和补偿形式3个方面进行了分析和探索。分析结果表明

与淮河流域现行的生态补偿方式相比

该框架能够全面反映跨省、跨地区的水质和水量差异

可操作性和适用性更强、覆盖面更广。

Abstract

Huaihe River basin was suffering from both the problems of water resources shortage and water quality-induced water shortage. The policies of contemporary eco-compensation in practic had unclear definition

regional limitations and also in lack of diversified compensation methods. In light of water contamination problem in Huaihe River basin

a new policy framework for eco-compensation was put forward based on water quality and quantity. Meanwhile

the analysis and exploration were carried on from the views of accounting

organization and compensation form. The results showed that the framework can fully reflect across different provinces

regions of the differences of water quality and quantity

compared with current ecological compensation pratices in Huaihe River basin

It was more preferable in operability

applicability and coverage.

关键词

Keywords

references

吕忠梅. 超越与保守:可持续发展视野下的环境法创新[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2003.

Brown P H, Lant C L. The effect of wetland mitigation banking on the achievement of no-net-loss[J]. Environmental Management, 1999, 23(3):333-345.

Alfsen K H, Birkelund H, Aaserud M. Impacts of an EC carbon/energy tax and deregulating thermal power supply on CO

, SO

and NOx emissions[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1995, 5(2):165-189.

Tobin J. A currency transactions tax, why and how[J]. Open Economies Review, 1996, 7(1):493-499.

Bomb C, McCormick K, Deurwaarder E, et al. Biofuels for transport in Europe:Lessons from Germany and the UK[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(4):2256-2267.

Barker T, Baylis S, Madsen P. A UK carbon/energy tax:The macroeconomics effects[J]. Energy Policy, 1993, 21(3):296-308.

张建肖,安树伟.国内外生态补偿研究综述[J].西安石油大学学报:社会科学版,2009,18(1):23-28.

Drechsler M, Watzold F. The importance of economic costs in the development of guidelines for spatial conservation management[J]. Biological Conservation, 2001,97(2):51-59.

Johst K, Drechsler M, Watozlod F. An ecological-economic modeling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(1):37-49.

宋蕾,李峰.矿产资源生态补偿现状及对策研究[J].兰州商学院学报,2006,22(4):24-27.

洪尚群,马丕京,郭慧光.生态补偿制度的探索[J].环境科学与技术,2001(5):40-43.

王金南,张惠远,万军.关于中国生态补偿机制与政策框架的思考[J].中国环境政策,2007,8(2):12-15.

Macmillan D C, Harley D, Morrison R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of woodland ecosystem restoration[J].Ecological Economics, 1998,27(3):313-324.

李文华,李世东,李芬,等. 森林生态补偿机制若干重点问题研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2007, 17(2):13-18.

李青,张落成,武清华. 太湖上游水源保护区生态补偿支付意愿问卷调查:以天目湖流域为例[J]. 湖泊科学,2011, 23(1):143-143.

Wjktzold F, Drechsler M. Spatially uniform versus spatially heterogeneous compensation payments for biodiversity enhancing land use measures[J].Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 31(1):73-93.

刘世梁,崔保山,温敏霞,等.重大工程对区域生态安全的驱动效应及指标体系构建[J].生态环境,2007,16(1):234-238.

张振明,刘俊国.生态系统服务价值研究进展[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(9):1835-1842.

禹雪中,李锦秀,骆辉煌,等.河流水污染损失补偿模型研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(1):57-61.

Allan J A. Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible[M]//Priorities for Water Resources Allocation and Management. London:Overseas Development Administration, 1993.

Mekonnen M M, Hoekstra A Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products[J]. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2011, 15(S1):1577-1600.

Views

1260

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Countermeasures for Soil and Water Conservation in the Huaihe River Basin Based on Ecological Vulnerability

Vulnerability Characteristics of Flood Disasters and Their Impact Factors in the Huaihe River Basin of Anhui Province

Drought Variations of Huaihe River Basin in Recent 60 Years

Probability Distribution Model and its Application on Extreme Precipitation in Huaihe River Basin

Evolution of Temporal-spatial Pattern of Grain Production and Its Driving Mechanism in Huaihe River Basin During 1990-2012

Related Author

YE Zheng-wei

YANG Zhong-xiang

LI Wei-tao

WANG Chun

GU Liu-wan

WANG Dong

XU Jingjing

ZHOU Liangguang

Related Institution

Department of Geography,Huaiyin Teachers College,Huai’an

The Bureau of Land Resources of Nantong

College of Geographic Information and Tourism, Chuzhou University

College of Urban & Environment Sciences, Central China Normal University

Anhui Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Integration and Application

⁰