Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Erodibility K Value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

LIU Bin-tao; TAO He-ping; SHI Zhan; SONG Chun-feng; GUO Bing

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Erodibility K Value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

- Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Erodibility K Value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 33, Issue 4, Pages: 11-16(2014)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川,成都,610041
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.017
  CLC：
- Published：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LIU Bin-tao, TAO He-ping, SHI Zhan, et al. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Erodibility K Value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 11-16.
DOI：

LIU Bin-tao, TAO He-ping, SHI Zhan, et al. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Erodibility K Value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 11-16. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.017.

摘要

土壤可蚀性反映了土壤对水力侵蚀作用的敏感性

是进行土壤侵蚀评价和预报的重要参数。收集了青藏高原1 255个典型土壤剖面资料

采用模型计算和面积加权分析方法确定了每一个土壤亚类的土壤可蚀性K值

结合青藏高原1:100万土壤类型图

分析了青藏高原土壤可蚀性K值的空间格局特征。结果表明

青藏高原土壤可蚀性K值平均为0.230 8

低可蚀性、较低可蚀性、中等可蚀性、较高可蚀性和高可蚀性土壤面积分别占该区面积的5.60%

18.23%

24.35%

44.02%和7.80%。土壤可蚀性以中等可蚀性和较高可蚀性为主

二者分布面积之和达1.77×10

占青藏高原总面积的68.37%;较高可蚀性、高可蚀性土壤主要分布在青藏高原中西部的羌塘高原、柴达木盆地和横断山区的低海拔河谷中。青藏高原土壤可蚀性K值具有明显的垂直分异特征

在横断山区最为显著

土壤可蚀性随海拔高度升高而降低。不同海拔高度的水热分异影响了土壤的理化特性

进而决定了青藏高原土壤可蚀性的垂直分带特征。

Abstract

Soil erodibility is an important index to measure soil susceptibility to water erosion

and an essential parameter needed for soil erosion evaluation and soil erosion prediction. Based on 1 255 typical soil profile data

the values of soil erodibility(K values) of all the soil types on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau were calculated by erosion-produtivity impact calculator(EPIC) mathematical model and GIS. On which the weighted averages of the areas with the different values of soil erodibility are derived

and the distribution of the values of soil erodibility is analyzed based on map(1:1 000 000) of soil types in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The results showed that the mean value of soil erodibility was 0.230 8

and the area of lower

less lower

moderate

less higher

higher erodibility soils occupied 5.60%

18.23%

24.35%

44.02% and 7.80% of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

respectively.The total area of moderate and less higher erodibility soils is 1.77×106 km2 which is 68.37% of the total research area. The less higher and higher erodibility soils distribute in the Qiangtang Plateau

the Qaidam Basin and the valley of the Hengduan Mountains. Soil erodibility vertical variations are obvious in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

and especially in the Hengduan Mountains. Soil erodibility shows a decreasing trend from lower altitude to higher altitude. The physical and chemical properties of soils are affected by the water and the heat condition along an elevational gradient

and then the vertical variations of the physical and chemical properties of soils determine the vertical variations of the soil erodibility.

关键词

Keywords

references

张科利,蔡永明,刘宝元,等. 黄土高原地区土壤可蚀性及其应用研究[J]. 生态学报,2001,21(10):1687-1695.

张科利,彭文英,杨红丽. 中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J]. 土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.

吴昌广,曾毅,周志翔,等. 三峡库区土壤可蚀性

值研究[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):8-12.

梁音,史学正. 长江以南东部丘陵山区土壤可蚀性

值研究[J]. 水土保持研究,1999,6(2):47-52.

王小丹,钟祥浩,王建平. 西藏高原土壤可蚀性及其空间分布规律初步研究[J]. 干旱区地理,2004,27(3):343-346.

阮伏水,吴雄海. 关于土壤可蚀性指标的讨论[J]. 水土保持通报,1996,16(6):68-72.

张向炎,于东升,史学正,等. 中国亚热带地区土壤可蚀性的季节性变化研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2009, 23(1):41-44.

张文太,于东升,史学正,等. 中国亚热带土壤可蚀性

值预测的不确定性研究[J]. 土壤学报,2009,46(2):185-191.

Tamlin C O, Wischmeier W H. Soil-erodibility evaluations for soil on the runoff and erosion stations[J]. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding, 1963,27(5):590-592.

Wischmeier W H, Johnson C B, Cross B V. A soil erodibility monograph for farmland and construction sites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971,26(3):189-93.

张宪奎,许靖华,卢秀琴,等. 黑龙江省土壤流失方程的研究[J]. 水土保持通报,1992,12(4):1-9.

张爱国,陕永杰,景小元. 中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性指数诺模图的制作与查用[J]. 山地学报,2003,21(5):615-619.

刘宝元,张科利,焦菊英. 土壤可蚀性及其在侵蚀预报中的应用[J]. 自然资源学报,1999,14(4):345-350.

United States Department of Agriculture. EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator(1):Model Document:Technical Bulletin Number 1768[M]. Washington D C:USDA-ARS, 1990.

Shirazi M A, Boerama L. A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture[J]. 1984,48(1):142-147.

刘吉峰,李世杰,秦宁生,等. 青海湖流域土壤可蚀性

值研究[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(6):321-326.

岑奕,丁文峰,张平仓. 华中地区土壤可蚀性因子研究[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(10):65-68.

郑度. 青藏高原形成环境与发展[M].河北石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,2003.

王根绪,李元寿,王一博. 青藏高原河源区地表过程与环境变化[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.

四川省农牧厅,四川省土壤普查办公室. 四川土种志[M].四川成都:四川科学技术出版社,1991.

青海省农业资源区划办公室. 青海土种志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.

西藏自治区土地管理局. 西藏自治区土种志[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.

国务院第一次全国水利普查领导小组办公室. 第一次全国水利普查培训教材之六:水土保持情况普查[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2011.

蔡永民,张科利,李双才. 不同粒径制间土壤质地资料的转换问题研究[J].土壤学报,2003,40(4):511-517.

侯大斌. 川渝地区土壤可蚀性评价[M].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2001.

杨子生. 滇东北山区坡耕地土壤可蚀性因子[J].山地学报,1999,17(S):10-15.

中国科学院地理研究所. 青藏高原地图集[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.

李明森. 横断山区土壤区划[J].山地研究,1989,7(1):38-46.

Views

1684

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models

Spatiotemporal evolution of productive-living-ecological space at county level of Qinling-Daba Mountains area under background of urban-rural integration

Soil erosion characteristics and assessment of their differences in typical regions of Fujian Province in 2024 based on CSLE model

Temporal and spatial distribution of soil erosion in Guanzhong region of Shaanxi Province from 2018 to 2022

Phosphorus content and its spatial heterogeneity in paddy soil with different parent materials at Jianghan Plain——Taking Jingzhou District in Hubei Province as an example

Related Author

Zhang Peng

Li Liangtao

Su Yujiao

Wang Qingtao

Han Hongying

Han Hongwei

Li Xiaojing

Li Chenxi

Related Institution

School of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Technology

Handan Forestry and Grassland Research Center

Handan City Landscape Bureau

School of Public Administration， Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology

Joint Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and

⁰