Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City

ZHANG Yong; LI Tu-sheng; PAN Jiang-ling; HU Hai-bo; ZHOU Zi-gui; ZHANG Xiao-mian

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City

- Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 33, Issue 3, Pages: 171-177(2014)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏,南京,210037
  2. 浙江省林业生态工程管理中心,浙江,杭州,310020
  3. 浙江省林业基金管理服务中心,浙江,杭州,310020
  4. 浙江省林业科学研究院,浙江,杭州,310023
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.033
  CLC：
- Published：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHANG Yong, LI Tu-sheng, PAN Jiang-ling, et al. Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 171-177.
DOI：

ZHANG Yong, LI Tu-sheng, PAN Jiang-ling, et al. Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 171-177. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.033.

摘要

以江苏省连云港市云台山22个宜林荒山地段为研究对象

共选取了16个立地因子

将其分成宏观因子和微观因子分别进行立地质量分类及评价

最后再综合起来评价。评价结果表明

22个地段最终分成5类。第1类主要特征为土层中上偏厚

宏观立地质量相对较好

土壤质量中等

包括2个地段;第2类为土层中上偏厚

宏观立地质量相对较好

土壤质量差

包括4个地段;第3类为土层中下偏薄

宏观立地质量相对一般

土壤质量中等

包括7个地段;第4类为土层中下偏薄

宏观立地质量相对一般

土壤质量差

包括7个地段;第5类主为土层非常薄

宏观立地质量很差

土壤质量中等

包括2个地段。综合分析表明

研究区立地质量整体不高

今后绿化造林任务十分艰巨。

Abstract

By taking the 22 barren hills for suitable afforestation in the Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City as the research object

16 site factors were selected and divided into macroscopic and microcosmic factors to conduct site quality classification and assessment

respectively. In the end

the classification and assessment results were combined. Results are as follows: The 22 hills could be divided into five types. The main features of the first type

consisting of 2 hills

had a medium or superior thickness of soil layer

relatively fine site quality of macroscopic factor and medium soil quality; the second type

consisting of 4 hills

a medium or superior thickness of soil layer

relatively fine site quality of macroscopic factor and poor soil quality; the third type

consisting of 7 hills

a medium or inferior thickness of soil layer

relatively medium site quality of macroscopic factor and medium soil quality; the fourth type

consisting of 7 hills

a medium or inferior thickness of soil layer

relatively medium site quality of macroscopic factor and poor soil quality; and the fifth type

consisting of 2 hills

a very thin thickness of soil layer

relatively very poor site quality of macroscopic factor and medium soil quality. In summary

the site quality in the research area is not fine as a whole

and afforestation will be very difficult in the future.

关键词

Keywords

references

于勇,周大迈,王红,等.土地资源评价方法及评价因素权重的确定探析[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(2):213-215.

中国森林立地分类6编写组.中国森林立地分类[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1989.

邓送求,闫家锋,关庆伟,等.基于聚类分析的风景林立地类型划分[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2009,33(3):73-77.

张万儒.中国森林立地[M].北京:科学出版社,1997.

樊华,赵方莹,孙保平,等.北京市门头沟区植被恢复立地类型划分[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(8):29-31.

周应书,何兴辉,谢永贵,等.毕节喀斯特山地植被恢复立地类型划分[J].林业科学,2008,44(12):123-128.

黄家荣,马天晓,王艳梅,等.基于BP网络的无林地立地质量评价模型研究[J].山地农业生物学报,2006,25(6):479-483.

郭艳荣,吴保国,刘洋,等.立地质量评价研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2012,25(5):47-52.

郑佳丽,高国雄,吕粉桃,等.青海省大通县脑山区退耕还林土壤质量演变评价[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(1):6-10.

王永昌.云台山立地分类及造林树种选择[J].中南林业调查规划,1994,13(3):5-7.

孙波,张桃林,赵其国.我国东南丘陵山区土壤肥力的综合评价[J].土壤学报,1995,32(4):362-369.

鲁法典,谷建才,贾俞彬,等.沂蒙工程造林区立地类型划分的研究[J].河北林学院学报,1996,11(1):37-40.

Sharply A N, Williams J R. Epic-erosion Productivity impact Calculator(Ⅰ):Model Documentation[M]. Washington D C:U S Department of Agriculture, 1990.

刘崇洪.几种土壤质量评价方法的比较[J].干旱环境监测,1996,10(1):26-29.

刘世梁,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.两种土壤质量变化的定量评价方法比较[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(5):422-426.

谢瑾,李永梅,候天才.纳板河流域不同土地利用类型下土壤综合肥力分析[J].云南农业大学学报,2012,27(3):401-407.

吴玉红,田霄鸿,同延安,等.基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(1):173-180.

唐晓平.四川紫色土肥力的Fuzzy综合评价[J].土壤通报,1997,28(3):107-109.

李学全,李松仁,韩旭里.AHP理论与方法研究:一致性检验与权重计算[J].系统工程学报,1997,12(2):111-117.

陶晓燕.基于主成分分析的资源型城市产业转型能力评价[J].资源与产业,2013,15(2):1-5.

Views

1553

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of photovoltaic panel height on soil physicochemical properties in rocky desertification areas with different slopes during dry season

An Elementary Study on New Soil Consolidator Used to Control Channel Seepage

Overview of Mechanism of Plant Roots Improving Soil Reinforcement and Slope Stabilization

Water-source Conservation Function of Forest Soil in East of Heilongjiang Province

Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Secondary Shrub and Artificial Chinese Pine Forest in Middle-mountain Areas of Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River

Related Author

Liu Yungen

Hu Jun

Zhang Jiaxu

Luo Zhifeng

Huang Caishuang

Gao Wenjiao

Wang Yan

ZHANG Hai-yan

Related Institution

College of Soil and Water Conservation， Southwest Forestry University

Key Laboratory of Evolution and Pollution Control of;Mountain Rural Ecological Environment in Yunnan Province

Institute of Water Resources and Hydro power Research , Northwest Science and Technology University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, Shannxi Province

Department of Environment, Nanchang Institute of Technolog

Department of Civil and Water Conservency, Nanchang Institute of Technology

⁰