Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Grassland Based on Grid GIS

GUO Bin; ZHOU Zhong-fa; SU Wei-ci; CHEN Quan; WEI Xiao-dao

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Grassland Based on Grid GIS

- Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Grassland Based on Grid GIS
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 33, Issue 2, Pages: 204-207(2014)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州师范大学中国南方喀斯特研究院,贵州,贵阳,550001
  2. 贵州省喀斯特山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地,贵州,贵阳,550001
  3. 贵州科学院山地资源研究所,贵州,贵阳,550001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.043
  CLC：
- Published：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
GUO Bin, ZHOU Zhong-fa, SU Wei-ci, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Grassland Based on Grid GIS[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 204-207.
DOI：

GUO Bin, ZHOU Zhong-fa, SU Wei-ci, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Vulnerability of Karst Grassland Based on Grid GIS[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 204-207. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.043.

摘要

以贵州省长顺县为研究区

以多元空间信息为基础

采用层次分析法(AHP)和主成分分析法并结合格网GIS技术

对评价体系中的各指标进行10 m×10 m尺度下的格网化

运用栅格数据的空间叠加方法及生态脆弱性的评价模型

分析获得了长顺县草地生态脆弱性的空间数据。根据生态脆弱性指数(EVI)将喀斯特山区的草地资源生态脆弱程度分为5个等级。分析结果显示

严重脆弱区的面积为36.32 km

所占比重最大;其次是中度脆弱区和极端脆弱区面积分别为28.09和24.99 km

最后

轻度脆弱区和潜在脆弱区面积分别为16.54和8.60 km

所占比重较小。从总体上看

长顺县草地生态脆弱性等级较高

喀斯特山区草地的生态脆弱性主要是由于特殊的地质背景和人类频繁活动干扰的结果。

Abstract

Based on multi-spatial information

analytic hierarchy process(AHP)

principal component analysis and grid GIS technology are applied in gridding the indicators of ecological vulnerability evaluation system at 10 m×10 m scale and achieving the spatial data about the ecological vulnerability of grassland in Changshun County

Guizhou Province. The ecological vulnerability of karst grassland is divided into 5 levels according to ecological vulnerability index(EVI). The analysis shows that the area of heavy vulnerability region is 36.32 km2

taking the largest proportion; the areas of moderate and extreme vulnerability regions are 28.09 km2 and 24.99 km2

respectively; and the areas of slight and potential vulnerability regions are 16.54 and 8.60 km2

respectively

taking smaller proportions. Overall

the ecological vulnerability of grassland in Changshun County is at a higher level and the ecological vulnerability of karst grassland is resulted from the special geological background and frequent human activity interference.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘斌涛,陶和平,刘邵权,等.自然灾害胁迫下区域生态脆弱性动态:以四川省清平乡为例[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1):193-198.

魏小岛,周忠发,王媛媛.基于格网GIS的喀斯特生态安全研究:以贵州花江石漠化综合治理示范区为例[J].山地学报,2012,30(6):681-687.

蒙晓,李晶,任志远,等.草地退化后陕北农牧交错带生态系统重建模式研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):140-144.

刘东霞,卢欣石.呼伦贝尔草原生态环境脆弱性评价[J].中国农业大学学报,2008,13(5):48-54.

张克湘.贵州省地图集[M]. 贵州贵阳:贵州省地图出版社,2005.

熊康宁,黎平,周忠发,等.喀斯特石漠化的遥感-GIS典型研究:以贵州省为例[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.

胡宝清,金姝兰,曹少英,等.基于GIS技术的广西喀斯特生态环境脆弱性综合评价[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):103-107.

李荣彪,洪汉烈,殷科,等.喀斯特生态环境敏感性评价:以都匀市为例[J].中国岩溶,2009,28(3):300-307.

乔青,高吉喜.生态脆弱性综合评价方法及应用[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(5):117-123.

刘正佳,于兴修,李蕾,等.基于SRP概念模型的沂蒙山区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(8):2084-2090.

赵同谦,欧阳志云.草地生态系统服务功能分析及其评价指标体系[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(6):155-160.

Views

1460

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Countermeasures for Soil and Water Conservation in the Huaihe River Basin Based on Ecological Vulnerability

Effects of Natural Enclosing on Grassland Communities in Yunwu Mountain

Ecological Fragile Assessment and Regional Development Model in Restrict Development Area of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

Assession of Ecological Vulnerability in Resource Enrichment Areas of Northern Shaanxi Province Based on Landscape Pattern -A Case Study of Shenmu County in Shaanxi Province

Response of Soil Erosion in Different Grasslands to Erosive Rainfall in Western Loess Hilly Region

Related Author

YE Zheng-wei

WAN Hui-e

CHENG Ji-min

HU Xiang-ming

ZHAO Yan-yun

YANG Mei-ling

LI Tong-sheng

MI Wen-bao

Related Institution

Department of Geography,Huaiyin Teachers College,Huai’an

Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling

Research Center for Eco-environment Science, Yellow River Delta, Binzhou University

Institute of Industrial Economics, CASS

School of Urban and Environment Science, Northwest University, Xian

⁰