Dynamic Evaluation of Regional Sustainability Based on Improved Ecological Footprint Factors-A Case Study in Shaanxi Province

GUO Xiao-na; LI Ze-hong; DONG Suo-cheng; XUE Dong-qian; CHEN Yan-xiao

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Dynamic Evaluation of Regional Sustainability Based on Improved Ecological Footprint Factors-A Case Study in Shaanxi Province

- Dynamic Evaluation of Regional Sustainability Based on Improved Ecological Footprint Factors-A Case Study in Shaanxi Province
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 33, Issue 2, Pages: 142-146(2014)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院,陕西,西安,710062
  2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.031
  CLC：
- Published：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
GUO Xiao-na, LI Ze-hong, DONG Suo-cheng, et al. Dynamic Evaluation of Regional Sustainability Based on Improved Ecological Footprint Factors-A Case Study in Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 142-146.
DOI：

GUO Xiao-na, LI Ze-hong, DONG Suo-cheng, et al. Dynamic Evaluation of Regional Sustainability Based on Improved Ecological Footprint Factors-A Case Study in Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 142-146. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.031.

摘要

生态足迹是评估区域可持续性的重要方法之一

已有研究多采用全国统一的均衡因子和产量因子进行测算。以陕西省为研究区

通过独立测算研究区各年份均衡因子和产量因子

对传统评估方法进行了改进。研究结果表明

陕西省均衡因子、产量因子与全国统一因子存在较大差异。尽管评价结果显示1995-2011年陕西省总体处于不可持续性状态

但所反映的生态赤字和生态压力指数均比较稳定

分别在0.1389~0.4978 hm

/人和1.1703~2.6137之间

该结果较传统研究结果数值偏小

但更贴近区域现实。从全球生态问题谈判的有利角度出发

我国有必要建立一套符合国情和区域特色的生态足迹测算因子和方法。

Abstract

Ecological footprint is one of the important methods to assess regional sustainability

and current researches usually adopt nationwide equivalence factor and yield factor. This paper

taking Shaanxi Province as a case study

estimated independently the equilibrium factor and yield factor for each year

and improved the traditional evaluation methods. The results indicated that there were big difference between factors of Shaanxi Province and nationwide unified factor. From 1995 to 2011

Shaanxi Province was general unsustainable

and the ecological deficit and ecological pressure index changed between 0.1389~0.4978 hm2/cap and 1.1703~2.6137 respectively

and kept relatively stable. compared to the result calculated by the global unity factor

the data form the present study were smaller than normal study and more closely to regional reality. Being good for the negotiations on global ecological problems

it is necessary to establish a set of ecological footprint calculation factor and method conform to national condition and regional characteristics.

关键词

Keywords

references

王书华,毛汉英,王忠静. 生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展[J]. 自然资源学报,2002,17(6):776-782.

牛文元. 持续发展导论[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1994.

Hardi P, Barg S, Hodge T, et al. Measuring sustainable development:Review of current practice[R]. Occasional Paper, 1997:1-2,49-51.

杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁. 生态足迹分析理论与方法[J]. 地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-636.

徐中民,张志强,程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J]. 地理学报,2000,55(5):607-616.

Rees W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity:What urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2):121-130.

Rees W E. Revisiting carrying capacity:Area-based indicators of sustainability[EB/OL]//Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprint Nation.http://www.ecuncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint, 1997.

Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3):375-390.

谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁,等. 中国的生态空间占用研究[J]. 资源科学,2001,23(6):20-23.

赵先贵,王书转,马彩虹,等. 西安市2002年生态足迹分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(6):33-37.

赵先贵,马彩虹,高立峰,等. 基于生态压力指数不同尺度区域生态安全评价[J]. 中国农业生态学报,2007,15(6):135-138.

李泽红,董锁成,汤尚颖,等. 基于生态足迹模型的石嘴山市生态经济可持续性评价[J]. 中国地质大学学报:社会科学版,2008,8(3):41-45.

欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报,1999,19(5):19-25.

张恒义,刘卫东,万世忠,等. "省公顷"生态足迹模型中的均衡因子及产量因子的计算:以浙江省为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2009,24(1):82-93.

Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz N B, et al. Calculating national and global ecological footprint tine series:resolving conceptual challenges[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3):271-278.

Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3):231-246.

牛若峰,刘天福. 农业技术经济手册[M].修订版.北京:农业出版社,1983.

吴介军,蔡琳,张秋花,等. 1993-2004年陕西省生态足迹分析与评价[J]. 陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,34(4):104-108.

徐坡,张阳生. 陕西省生态足迹动态变化分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2011,39(8):4862-4866.

王伟,韦苇. 动态生态足迹测度与分析:陕西省可持续发展研究[J]. 重庆工商大学学报:西部论坛,2007,17(4):52-56.

Views

1274

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Calculation and Analysis of Ecological Footprint of Xi'an City

A Study of Regional Sustainable Development Based on Modified Model of Energetic Ecological Footprint-A Case Study of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province

Econometric Analysis of Relationship Between Ecological Footprint and Economic Growth in Rizhao City

Evaluation of Ecological Carrying Capacity of Resource Cities Based on Ecological Footprint Model -A Case Study at Daqing City, Heilongjiang Province

Spatiotemporal Variations of Ecological Carrying Capacity in Ordos Plateau During 2000-2015

Related Author

ZHANG Xin-zhu

CAO Ming-ming

SHENG Ye-xu

LIU Qiong

OU Ming-hao

ER Ling-li

YANG Kaiqi

LI Junli

Related Institution

Urban and Resource Department,Northwest University

Jiangsu Institute of Land Surveying and Planning

College of Land Management, Nanjing Agricultural University

College of Geography and Tourist, Qufu Normal University

College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling

⁰