Effect of Vegetation Recovery on Soil Physical Properties in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone

YANG Feng-qun; QI Yan-bing; CHANG Qing-rui; YAO Ya-qing; HUANG Cong

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effect of Vegetation Recovery on Soil Physical Properties in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone

- Effect of Vegetation Recovery on Soil Physical Properties in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 33, Issue 2, Pages: 57-62(2014)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 农业部西北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.013
  CLC：
- Published：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
YANG Feng-qun, QI Yan-bing, CHANG Qing-rui, et al. Effect of Vegetation Recovery on Soil Physical Properties in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 57-62.
DOI：

YANG Feng-qun, QI Yan-bing, CHANG Qing-rui, et al. Effect of Vegetation Recovery on Soil Physical Properties in Agro-pastoral Transitional Zone[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 57-62. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.013.

摘要

以地处毛乌素沙地南缘的榆林市沙生植物园植被恢复30 a的10种植被类型下土壤为研究对象

对不同植被类型下土壤物理性质进行了对比分析。结果表明

植被恢复可以改善土壤物理性质

与流动沙地相比较

植被恢复后表层土壤容重降低了0.1~0.5 g/cm

土壤总孔隙度提高了1%~10%

土壤颗粒组成虽然仍然呈现砂粒占绝对优势

但明显表现出细化的趋势

1~0.25 mm含量明显降低

其它粒级含量呈不同程度的升高。不同植被类型对土壤的改良作用差异显著

灌木对土壤物理性质的改良作用优于草本和乔木

其中柠条较其它植物种类可更好地改善土壤物理性状。

Abstract

The paper investigated and compared the soil physical properties of the soils under ten different vegetation types(30 a) in psammophyte garden in Yulin City

which locates in the south of Mu Us sandy land. The results showed that vegetation restoration could improve the soil physical properties. Compared with the moving sandy land

soil bulk density of surface soil decreased by 0.1~0.5 g/cm3 and the soil total porosity increased by 1%~10%. Although the sand grains was still the dominant component of soil particle composition it showed a trend of refinement. The content of 1~0.25 mm decreased significantly

and other size fractions increased to certain degrees. Significant difference was found in different vegetation types on the amelioration of soil. The shrub was better than herb and tree in improving soil properties

of which the Caragana was much superior to other species.

关键词

Keywords

references

爱东,陈善科,庄光辉,等.内蒙古高原荒漠化治理途径的探讨[J].草业科学,2005,22(1):15-17.

乔峰,张克斌.宁夏盐池县不同荒漠化治理措施生物多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):55-57.

Wei Yuan, Yu Lifei, Zhang Jinchi, et al. Relationship between vegetation restoration and soil microbial characteristics in degraded karst regions:A case study[J]. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(1):351-368.

吴薇.近50年来毛乌素沙地的荒漠化过程研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,21(2):164-169.

胡兵辉,廖允成.毛乌素沙地典型县域土壤沙漠化过程研究[J].人民黄河,2012,34(2):89-92.

张玉兰,陈利军.沙漠化逆转过程中土壤性状演变综述[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(7):1440-1450.

吴彦,刘庆,乔永康,等.亚高山针叶林不同恢复阶段群落多样性变化及其对土壤理化性质的影响[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(6):648-655.

Yang Yue, Eerdun Hasi, Sun Baoping. Effects of vegetation restoration in different types on soil nutrients in Southern Edge of Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Soil and Fertilizer, 2012,13(8):1708-1712.

段民福,廖超英.毛乌素沙地樟子松人工林木土壤物理性质的时空变异规律[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(3):188-192.

Jiao Feng, Wen Zhongming, An Shaoshan. Changes in soil properties across a chronosequence of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Catena, 2011,86(2):110-116.

王丽,梦丽,张金池,等.不同植被恢复模式下矿区废弃地土壤水分物理性质的研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(3):54-57.

李裕元,邵明安.水蚀风蚀交错带植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(16):4306-4316.

伍玉容,王洁.黄土丘陵植被恢复区不同植被类型对土壤物理性质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2009,28(3):96-98.

屈佳,常庆瑞,王耀宗.农牧交错带土地荒漠化动态景观格局分析:以靖边县杨桥畔镇为例[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(1):166-170.

李玉山. 黄土高原综合治理开发与黄河断流的关系[J]. 水土保持通报,1998,18(6):42-45.

An Shaoshan, Huang Yimei, Zheng Fenli, et al. Aggregate characteristics during natural revegetation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Pedosphere, 2008, 18(6):809-816.

王忠林,高国雄,李会科,等.毛乌素沙地农田防护林结构配置研究[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(2):99-108.

鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.

张学权,胡庭兴.林(竹)草不同植被恢复模式下的土壤物理特性[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(4):623-627.

李裕元,郑纪勇,邵明安,等. 黄土高原北部草地的恢复与重建对土壤碳密度的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2279-2287.

常庆瑞,安韶山. 黄土高原恢复植被防止土地退化效益研究[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):40-44.

丁文峰,丁登山.黄土高原植被破坏前后土壤团粒结构分形特征[J].地理研究,2002,21(6):700-706.

陈奇伯,王克勤. 金沙江干热河谷不同类型植被改良土壤效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2003,17(2):109-113.

王国梁,刘国彬.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):1-5.

常庆瑞,安韶山,刘京,等.陕北农牧交错带土地荒漠化本质特性研究[J].土壤学报,2003,40(4):518-523.

张素霞,吕家珑. 黄土高原不同植被坡地土壤无机磷形态分布研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(1):29-32.

Views

1326

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Heterogeneity of Soil Physical Properties Under Different Vegetation Types in Tianlaochi Watershed of Upper Stream of Heihe River Basin

Characteristics of Soil Water -holding and Soil Porosity Under Different Tree Species After Conversion of Cropland to Forest in the Loss Hilly Region

Effect of Soil Bulk Density on Process of Soil Solute Transport

Effects of Different Amendments on Water and Salt Characteristics of Coastal Saline Soil

Effectiveness evaluation of ecological product value realization in northwest China——An analysis of 29 typical cases

Related Author

WANG Yang

WANG Chao

ZHAO Chuan-yan

LIU Yi-yue

WANG Zhi-qiang

ZHANG Guang-hui

ZHANG Yong-xuan

ZHANG Guang-can

Related Institution

College of Life Science, Lanzhou University

College of Environment and Resources, Lanzhou University

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,School of Geography,Beijing Normal University

中国林业科学研究院林业研究所国家林业局林木培育实验室

山东农业大学林学院山东农业大学农业生态与环境重点实验室

⁰