ZHANG Xing-juan, WANG Zhi-min, GUO Wen-zhong, et al. Influences of Different Treatments on Soil Evaporation After Irrigation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 74-78.
DOI:
ZHANG Xing-juan, WANG Zhi-min, GUO Wen-zhong, et al. Influences of Different Treatments on Soil Evaporation After Irrigation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 74-78. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.01.037.
Influences of Different Treatments on Soil Evaporation After Irrigation
Soil evaporation (Es) is considered to be an important component of evapotranspiration (ET). In dry land of North China
the amount of water loss from soil through evaporation can take up to 50% or more of precipitation in the same period and during wheat growing season
evaporation can take up to 66% of field evapotranspiration. Research on soil evaporation and how to reduce soil evaporation is significant to find an approach to an efficient use of water resources. This preliminary study was conducted to examine the influences of different treatment measures on soil evaporation using a weighing lysimeter system. Results show that straw mulching and high stubble can restrain soil evaporation after irrigation when soil water content is high. In clear weather
soil evaporation intensity reaches the maximum at about 10:30 am
but straw mulching and high stubble can make it later. Loosing soil when soil water content is high cannot restrain soil evaporation
but it can significantly restrain soil evaporation when water content is reduced to a certain degree.
Flerchinger G N, Sauer T J, Aiken R A. Effects of crop residue cover and architecture on heat and water transfer at the soil surface[J]. Geoderma, 2003,116(1):217-233.
Balwinder-Singh. The effect of rice straw mulch on evapotranspiration, anspiration and soil evaporation of irrigated wheat in Punjab, India[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011,98(12):1847-1855.