Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Storage Capacity for Six Main Forest Lands in Wuyishan Scenery District
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Storage Capacity for Six Main Forest Lands in Wuyishan Scenery District
Bulletin of Soiland Water ConservationVol. 30, Issue 3, Pages: 60-65(2011)
作者机构:
1. 福建省绿色化工技术重点实验室,武夷学院 环境与建筑工程系,福建 武夷山,354300
3. 武夷山风景名胜区管理委员会,福建 武夷山,354300
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2011
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LI Ling, ZHANG Yu, KONG Li-na, et al. Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Storage Capacity for Six Main Forest Lands in Wuyishan Scenery District[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2011, 30(3): 60-65.
DOI:
LI Ling, ZHANG Yu, KONG Li-na, et al. Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Storage Capacity for Six Main Forest Lands in Wuyishan Scenery District[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2011, 30(3): 60-65.DOI:
Soil Physical Characteristics and Water Storage Capacity for Six Main Forest Lands in Wuyishan Scenery District
soil moisture capacity and water storage characteristics for six main forest types in Wuyishan Scenery District were studied.Results are as follows.(1)The soil bulk density in the top 60 cm followed the order of: chinese fir forests> masson pine forests> shrubs> mixed forest>moso bamboo forests> broadleaf forest.(2)The total porosity and maximum water-holding capacity were:broadleaf forest> moso bamboo forests>mixed forests> shrubs> masson pine forests> chinese fir forests;and the capillary porosity and field moisture capacity were: Moso bamboo forests> broadleaf forests> mixed forests > shrubs> masson pine forests> chinese fir forests; the soil noncapillary porosity was broadleaf forests> mixed forests > shrubs > masson pine forests> chinese fir forests> moso bamboo forests; the soil capillary waterholding was moso bamboo forests> broadleaf forests> shrubs> mixed forests > masson pine forests> chinese fir forests.(3)In the layer of 0-60cm
the order of soil total storage capacity was broadleaf forests> moso bamboo forests> mixed forests> shrubs> masson pine forests> chinese fir forests.The storage volumetric capacity of moso bamboo forests was the largest
but its transmission volumetric capacity was the smallest.Given the same site condition
the soil physical characteristics of the broadleaf forest were superior to those of the others and therefore provided the best function of soil and water conservation.