Quality Evaluation of Protection Forest Based on Grid and Matter Element Model

CHEN Jun-hua; ZHU Zhi-fang; GONG Gu-tang; WANG Shi-ying; WU Xue-xian; HE Zheng-wei

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Quality Evaluation of Protection Forest Based on Grid and Matter Element Model

- Quality Evaluation of Protection Forest Based on Grid and Matter Element Model
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 30, Issue 4, Pages: 116-121(2011)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 成都理工大学地球科学学院,四川,成都,610059
  2. 四川省林业科学研究院,四川,成都,610081
  3. 四川师范大学,四川,成都,610101
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2011
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
CHEN Jun-hua, ZHU Zhi-fang, GONG Gu-tang, et al. Quality Evaluation of Protection Forest Based on Grid and Matter Element Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2011, 30(4): 116-121.
DOI：

CHEN Jun-hua, ZHU Zhi-fang, GONG Gu-tang, et al. Quality Evaluation of Protection Forest Based on Grid and Matter Element Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2011, 30(4): 116-121. DOI：

摘要

利用2006年度平通河流域ETM+卫星图片，结合该区域森林资源二类调查小班数据、林相图、1∶5万和1∶10万地形图，卫星图片解译后，将矢量文件转换成格网，选取林分结构因子、生产力因子和功能因子，采用物元分析法对每个格网进行了分级评价。结果表明：(1)平通河流域薪炭林面积占很大优势，面积为32 785.4 hm2，占总面积的42.45%；其次是水土保持林和水源涵养林，前者为18 441.86 hm2，占总面积的23.88%；后者为12 047.44 hm2，占总面积的15.60%。经济林面积较小，面积为4 217.3 hm2，仅占总面积的5.46%。(2)平通河流域防护林质量总体评价较差，以中等级所占比例最大(62.75%)，其次是良好等级(21.21%)；处于差等级的所占比例也占到13.96%；处于优等级的只占1.24%。

Abstract

Interpreted ET M+in 2006

150000 and 1100000 topographical map

forest type map

data of Class II forest inventory in 2007 in Pingtonghe watershed were applicated.Firstly

the satellite images was interpreted and the vector format was converted to grid format

then grade assessment of each grid was carried out by using element model on the basis of selecting stand structure factor

production capacity factor and function factor.The results showed that:(1)The area of firewood forest in this area was in the ascendant (32785.4 hm2

or occupying 42.45% of the total area);it was followed by water conservation forest and soil and water conservation forest

the former occupied 23.88% (18 441.86 hm2) and the latter accounted f or 15.60% ( 12 047.44 hm2);while economic forest only occupied 5.46% (4217.3 hm2).(2)On the whole

the quality of protection forest was poor:the middle grade occupied 62.75%

the next was fine grade(21.21%)

the poor grade made up 13.96%;however

the superior grade only accounted for 1.24%.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1406

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

A Study on Effects of Artificial Afforestation on Soil Nutrients Based on Matter Element Model

Present Situation Analysis and Type Division of Low-benefit Protection Forest in Saline Alkali Soil of Yellow River Delta

Leaf and Soil Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of Tree Species of Different Origins in a Tropical Coastal Shelterbelt Belt of Hainan Island

Influence of different restoration measures on vegetation characteristics and diversity of degraded grasslands in Ili， Xinjiang

Influence of soluble salt content on strength of Ili loess under wet-dry cycle conditions

Related Author

GUO Yangyang

YAO Yunfeng

QIN Fucang

LI Yinghua

LIU Junhua

WANG Yuehai

HAN Youji

XIA Jiangbao

Related Institution

Inner Mongolia Agricultural University

Water Conservancy Bureau of Aohan Banner, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia Region

Shandong Academy of Forestry

Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for Yellow River Delta, Binzhou University

Combined Training Base of Jinan Military Area Command

⁰