Ecological Risk Assessment on Land Use in Changli Gold Coast National Nature Reserve Based on Relative Risk Model
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Ecological Risk Assessment on Land Use in Changli Gold Coast National Nature Reserve Based on Relative Risk Model
Bulletin of Soiland Water ConservationVol. 32, Issue 2, Pages: 241-246(2013)
作者机构:
河北师范大学资源与环境科学学院河北省环境演变与生态建设实验室,河北,石家庄,050024
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2013
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jing-jing, GAO Wei-ming. Ecological Risk Assessment on Land Use in Changli Gold Coast National Nature Reserve Based on Relative Risk Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2013, 32(2): 241-246.
DOI:
ZHANG Wei, ZHAO Jing-jing, GAO Wei-ming. Ecological Risk Assessment on Land Use in Changli Gold Coast National Nature Reserve Based on Relative Risk Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2013, 32(2): 241-246.DOI:
Ecological Risk Assessment on Land Use in Changli Gold Coast National Nature Reserve Based on Relative Risk Model
field investigation and collected documents in 2010
we conducted an ecological risk assessment on the Changli Gold Coast National Nature Reserve by applyingthe relative risk model(RRM).By applying this model
we obtained a relationship of relative risks
which isapplicable to comparing ecological risk degree among the assessment subdivisions in the study area.In orderto compare their relative risk values
the reserve is divided into five ecological risk districts according to theirdifferent functions
i.e.
core region
buffer region
Qilihai area
Luanhekou area and Chiyangkou area.Furthermore
we grouped the pressure sources caused by human development six risk resources
includingfishery
artificial coastline
buildings
tourists
highway and canal
and agricultural land.By modeling therisk resources
habitats
risk-exposure and ecological receptor response and analyzing the data
the relativerisk values for the five ecological risk areas and six risk resources were calculated.For the five ecological riskdistricts
the relative risk of Luanhekou is 3.45
Chiyangkou 2.46
Qilihai 2.19
core region 1.19
and buffer region 0.45.For the six risk sources
the value of fishery is 2.52
artificial coastline 2.31
buildings1.30
tourists 1.23
highway and canal 1.20
and agricultural land 1.19.The risk values in the three areashigher than the two regions indicated that the areas were not favorable for the sustainable development of theecological environment of the nature reserve.Among the six risk sources
fishery imposed highest pressure on the reserve as the major threatening factor.