Socio-economic and Ecological Sustainability in Rural Household Energy Consumption in Loess Tableland Area
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Socio-economic and Ecological Sustainability in Rural Household Energy Consumption in Loess Tableland Area
Bulletin of Soiland Water ConservationVol. 32, Issue 4, Pages: 70-76(2013)
作者机构:
1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,陕西,西安,710127
2. 内蒙古城市规划市政设计研究院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010070
3. 陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院,陕西,西安,710062
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2013
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
HOU Hong-rui, WU Wen-heng, DUAN Zhi-yong, et al. Socio-economic and Ecological Sustainability in Rural Household Energy Consumption in Loess Tableland Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2013, 32(4): 70-76.
DOI:
HOU Hong-rui, WU Wen-heng, DUAN Zhi-yong, et al. Socio-economic and Ecological Sustainability in Rural Household Energy Consumption in Loess Tableland Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2013, 32(4): 70-76.DOI:
Socio-economic and Ecological Sustainability in Rural Household Energy Consumption in Loess Tableland Area
Close attention to the socio-economic and ecological cost of the rural energy use is of great significance to the rural sustainable development.With the questionnaire about the rural household energy consumption in the loess tableland area
an accounting model was established to estimate the economic cost
ecological cost and scrap quantity in various energy consumption structure.The result showed that presently the overall energy consumption level was low with average consumption of 2 018.16kg of standard coal equivalent per household and 731.41kg per person;the household energy consumption was mainly depended on the cash and energy availability with little consideration into the ecological cost;compared with the present situation
there are big differences in the economic cost
ecological cost and waste quantity among 9kinds of energy consumption types.It is indicated that the use of biogas and solar power is the direction of rural energy consumption structure adjustment in the future because of its overall low socio-economic and ecological cost. Biogas could be the most effective substitution for firewood and would be the main way of energy consumption for the area to form a virtuous cycle of energy utilization and ecological construction.