Research on Ecological Risk Assessment of Vegetation Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Research on Ecological Risk Assessment of Vegetation Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin
Bulletin of Soiland Water ConservationVol. 32, Issue 1, Pages: 201-205(2013)
作者机构:
西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2013
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LI Bo, SHI Pei-ji, JIN Shu-ting. Research on Ecological Risk Assessment of Vegetation Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2013, 32(1): 201-205.
DOI:
LI Bo, SHI Pei-ji, JIN Shu-ting. Research on Ecological Risk Assessment of Vegetation Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2013, 32(1): 201-205.DOI:
Research on Ecological Risk Assessment of Vegetation Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin
Regional ecological risk assessment is characterized by multiple risk stressors
receptors and endpoints with uncertain factors and spatial heterogeneity.By taking the vegetation ecosystem of the ShiyangRiver basin in Gansu Province for an example
the ecological indices of fragility degree
ecological loss andrisk source level of different vegetation ecosystems are analyzed for different risk patches by overlaying analysis with the aid of ArcGIS 9.3.Results show that the spatial variability of vegetation ecological risk in theShiyang River basin is more obvious.The first level risk area
accounting for 3.87% of the total area
ismainly located in the upper reaches of the Shiyang River basin
with Sunan and Tianzhu Counties being mostconcentrated and vegetation type being mostly woodland.The second level risk area
accounting for 4.38%of the total area
is connected with the first level risk area and vegetation type is mostly shrubbery.The thirdlevel and low level risk areas are mainly located in the downstream and midstream and vegetation types aregrassland and farmland.Finally
the large-scale land development and utilization of Shiyang River basinshould be avoided in the first and second level risk areas
and land use in the third level and low level risk areas should be protected.